On 2014 Jan 25, at 14:23, Mike Abdullah wrote:
> is there actually any harm in using the new style journal, does anybody know?
The bug reported by Glenn Austin in this thread, that future store migrations
may cause data loss for some users, seems pretty serious to me. Here are more
reports o
Hi Mike,
For your packaged store, I think wal is a better solution as Apple as chosen to
enable it by default on both OSX and iOS. But for NSPersistentDocument, this is
the wrong choice as documents must be made of one file to avoid confusion for
users manipulating files manually in the finder
On 2014 Jan 26, at 20:28, Glenn L. Austin wrote:
> Migration may fail as the WAL file for the old store isn't removed before
> attempting to open the new, migrated store -- which doesn't match the old
> store's WAL file…
Glenn, just to be clear, is the “migration” you are referring to here th
On Jan 25, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Mike Abdullah wrote:
> Presently BSManagedDocument is set up to configure Core Data to use the
> old-style journal (as I still support 10.6). However, the more I read on the
> subject, the more I wonder if this is worth it. Since the actual persistent
> store is k
On 21 Jan 2014, at 21:24, Jerry Krinock wrote:
>
> On 2014 Jan 21, at 09:02, Mike Abdullah wrote:
>
>> If it helps, I maintain https://github.com/karelia/BSManagedDocument as a
>> nice way to have a package-based document using Core Data.
>
> Thank you, Mike. Now I have two reasons to star
On 2014 Jan 21, at 09:02, Mike Abdullah wrote:
> If it helps, I maintain https://github.com/karelia/BSManagedDocument as a
> nice way to have a package-based document using Core Data.
Thank you, Mike. Now I have two reasons to start using BSManagedDocument :)
Also, I have now confirmed the b
On 21 Jan 2014, at 16:11, Sean McBride wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:06:16 -0800, Jerry Krinock said:
>
>> On 2014 Jan 20, at 09:50, Sean McBride wrote:
>>
>> The trouble occurs if a developer of an older Core Data app begins to
>> link against the 10.9 SDK, and allows the *new* default jou
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:06:16 -0800, Jerry Krinock said:
>On 2014 Jan 20, at 09:50, Sean McBride wrote:
>
>> I opt out of WAL in configurePersis
>tentStoreCoordinatorForURL:ofType:mod
>elConfiguration:storeOptions:error:, but my official buildbot is not
>actually linking against the 10.9 SDK yet,
On 2014 Jan 20, at 09:50, Sean McBride wrote:
> I opt out of WAL in
> configurePersistentStoreCoordinatorForURL:ofType:modelConfiguration:storeOptions:error:,
> but my official buildbot is not actually linking against the 10.9 SDK yet,
> so my experience may not count for much.
Hmmm, I do it
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:34:46 -0800, Jerry Krinock said:
>In a post today in the Developer Forums [1], developer Romain Piveteau
>mentioned in discussing another topic that, in a Core Data app, he “can
>not disable journaling mode” (by which I presume he means that setting
>the journaling mode to
In a post today in the Developer Forums [1], developer Romain Piveteau
mentioned in discussing another topic that, in a Core Data app, he “can not
disable journaling mode” (by which I presume he means that setting the
journaling mode to the legacy “rollback” mode [2] is ineffective) when the u
11 matches
Mail list logo
