Re: Localization and Regions

2011-11-07 Thread Gerriet M. Denkmann
On 8 Nov 2011, at 13:45, Gary L. Wade wrote: > That's how it's always worked. I just did show the font panel in TextEdit and looked at Arial: 10.5 shows Bold, Italic. etc. (English) 10.6 and 10.7 show Fett, Kursiv etc. (German). So this NSFont behaviour (which I guess is used in the font pane

Re: Localization and Regions

2011-11-07 Thread Gerriet M. Denkmann
On 8 Nov 2011, at 13:45, Gary L. Wade wrote: > That's how it's always worked. One can argue that Apple should ask the user, > when moving a more-specific locale (en-GB) away from a less-specific locale > (en), if the less-specific locale should "stick around" and be moved up into > the intuiti

Re: Localization and Regions

2011-11-07 Thread Gary L. Wade
That's how it's always worked. One can argue that Apple should ask the user, when moving a more-specific locale (en-GB) away from a less-specific locale (en), if the less-specific locale should "stick around" and be moved up into the intuitive order following the more-specific locale. Naturally,

Localization and Regions

2011-11-07 Thread Gerriet M. Denkmann
Assuming that I have the following language preferences (System Preferences → Language and Text → Language): British English, Deutsch Français English what is a program supposed to do if it has: en.lproj de.lproj but NOT en_GB.lproj ? I guess (but did not find an authoritative answer) that it s