On Thu, Apr 10, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Jonathan Mitchell wrote:
>
> On 10 Apr 2014, at 17:09, Kyle Sluder wrote:
>
> > On Apr 10, 2014, at 6:25 AM, Jonathan Mitchell wrote:
> >>
> >> On some occasions I want my controls to collapse and set a width defining
> >> constraint constant to zero.
> >
>
On 10 Apr 2014, at 17:09, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2014, at 6:25 AM, Jonathan Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> On some occasions I want my controls to collapse and set a width defining
>> constraint constant to zero.
>
> In general, views should not be resized to zero width or height. A lot of
On 10 Apr 2014, at 17:09, Kyle Sluder wrote:
>>
>> Is the only workaround to wrap such controls in another view and collapse
>> the superview instead?
>
> If you want to remove a view, you should really remove it from its superview.
> You could look into NSStackView, which will do this autom
On Apr 10, 2014, at 6:25 AM, Jonathan Mitchell wrote:
>
> On some occasions I want my controls to collapse and set a width defining
> constraint constant to zero.
In general, views should not be resized to zero width or height. A lot of times
things will break internally (divide by zero errors
On some occasions I want my controls to collapse and set a width defining
constraint constant to zero.
In some cases, say a checkbox, an onscreen artefact remains.
I presume that this is because the constraint is defining the layout rather
than the frame rectangle.
Is the only workaround to wra
