Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-09 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Monday, Feb 3, 2003, at 14:28 Europe/London, Ugo Cei wrote: It goes something like this (this is a flowscript fragment for retrieving a business entity, having "id" as it's POID [1], into a bean, associating it with a form, posting it to the user, awaiting submission, validating and storin

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-05 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Antonio Gallardo wrote: I will start my next Cocoon application soon. Of course I dont want to lose some of these great new stuff. I am considering the use of JavaBeans as was recommended in this thread. I was researching about the JavaBeans and XDoclet Well currently I found some interesti

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-04 Thread Ugo Cei
Jeremy Quinn wrote: Do the XMLForm Components (Action & Transformer) get used in your Sitemap, or are the calls to 'form' methods from your FlowScript the only references that are required? Transformer: yes. Actions: no. I use the transformer to do form/model population and validation just li

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-04 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Tuesday, Feb 4, 2003, at 14:39 Europe/London, Ugo Cei wrote: Antonio Gallardo wrote: Master, Disciple, ;-) I am beginning to grok, Master ;) I don't understand yet the interaction between the XMLForm infrastructure and Flow. Do the XMLForm Components (Action & Transformer) get use

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-04 Thread Ugo Cei
Antonio Gallardo wrote: Then I need to find other tool that can create the Beans and easily mantain it. You suggested Hibernate. Can you provide a website when I can learn more about Hibernate? http://hibernate.bluemars.net/ -- Ugo Cei - Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica P.le Volo

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-04 Thread Antonio Gallardo
hi: As you suggested, then I think there is not need to go to deeply to UML. Sometimes I get too deeply in things. :-( What I was trying to find is a way to easy mantain the EJB. Druid (http://druid.sourceforge.net/) can can generate the following code based on a SQL model: //===

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-04 Thread Ugo Cei
Antonio Gallardo wrote: Master, Disciple, ;-) Can you show us the light? As I posted before I never used beans. But after seeing some comments here. I feel as something is missing to me. I want to do Java Beans. I use jEdit to work. :-) I suspect that you might be confusing plain Java Beans

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-04 Thread Antonio Gallardo
I will start my next Cocoon application soon. Of course I dont want to lose some of these great new stuff. I am considering the use of JavaBeans as was recommended in this thread. I was researching about the JavaBeans and XDoclet Well currently I found some interesting tools: UML Case that ge

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-04 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Monday, Feb 3, 2003, at 22:58 Europe/London, Ugo Cei wrote: Jeremy Quinn wrote: What I meant was that in order to get to the point where you have the whole process controlled by such a simple flowscript you had to do lots of other very complex stuff to sit behind it. Not at all. Form popu

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Ugo Cei dijo: > Jeremy Quinn wrote: >> What I meant was that in order to get to the point where you have the >> whole process controlled by such a simple flowscript you had to do >> lots of other very complex stuff to sit behind it. > > Not at all. Form population and validation is from XMLForms,

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Ugo Cei
Jeremy Quinn wrote: What I meant was that in order to get to the point where you have the whole process controlled by such a simple flowscript you had to do lots of other very complex stuff to sit behind it. Not at all. Form population and validation is from XMLForms, persistence is Hibernate,

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Monday, Feb 3, 2003, at 18:19 Europe/London, Ugo Cei wrote: Jeremy Quinn wrote: I see what you mean, but is this not merely hiding a lot of complexity that you have had to put elsewhere? I don't get your point. Isn't all of OOP about hiding complexity? ;-) Yea, sorry, I did not explain

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Monday, Feb 3, 2003, at 16:43 Europe/London, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: SQL Inserts/Updates using SQLTransformer (maybe not capable of the job due to complexities of the multiple Table updating required ? ) We are using the SQLTransformer for all insert/updates etc on the company that I wor

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Monday, Feb 3, 2003, at 15:02 Europe/London, Geoff Howard wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SQL Editor Hi Guys I am looking into implementing a forms-based editor for a

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Monday, Feb 3, 2003, at 14:50 Europe/London, Antonio Gallardo wrote: Jeremy Quinn dijo: Hi Guys I am looking into implementing a forms-based editor for a complex set of inter-related SQL Tables (with lots of gruesome link tables etc.). What is currently considered the best technique to be

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Ugo Cei
Jeremy Quinn wrote: I see what you mean, but is this not merely hiding a lot of complexity that you have had to put elsewhere? I don't get your point. Isn't all of OOP about hiding complexity? ;-) Ugo -- Ugo Cei - Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica P.le Volontari del Sangue, 2

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Monday, Feb 3, 2003, at 14:28 Europe/London, Ugo Cei wrote: Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi Guys I am looking into implementing a forms-based editor for a complex set of inter-related SQL Tables (with lots of gruesome link tables etc.). What is currently considered the best technique to be using in

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Monday, Feb 3, 2003, at 14:26 Europe/London, Luca Morandini wrote: I know this has become sort of a joke but... why don't you use stored procedures ? Yes, MySQL hasn't them, but PostgresSQL has them, and so do many other proprietary DBMSes. Unfortunately we already have MySQL in place. An

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi Guys I am looking into implementing a forms-based editor for a complex set of inter-related SQL Tables (with lots of gruesome link tables etc.). What is currently considered the best technique to be using in Cocoon right now? XMLForm (we don't use Beans) OriginalDBActio

RE: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Geoff Howard
> -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:11 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: SQL Editor > > > Hi Guys > > I am looking into implementing a forms-based editor for a complex set > of inter

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Jeremy Quinn dijo: > Hi Guys > > I am looking into implementing a forms-based editor for a complex set > of inter-related SQL Tables (with lots of gruesome link tables etc.). > > What is currently considered the best technique to be using in Cocoon > right now? > > XMLForm (we don't use Beans) I t

Re: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Ugo Cei
Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi Guys I am looking into implementing a forms-based editor for a complex set of inter-related SQL Tables (with lots of gruesome link tables etc.). What is currently considered the best technique to be using in Cocoon right now? XMLForm (we don't use Beans) OriginalDBActio

RE: SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Luca Morandini
GIS Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html - > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SQL Editor

2003-02-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Guys I am looking into implementing a forms-based editor for a complex set of inter-related SQL Tables (with lots of gruesome link tables etc.). What is currently considered the best technique to be using in Cocoon right now? XMLForm (we don't use Beans) OriginalDBActions (obsolete ? ) Modu