> http://cservice.undernet.org/live/www.websurf.ro/personal , probably because
When you set the URL, you should use http:// first. eg:
http://www.websurf.ro/personal
not:
www.websurf.ro/personal
Go use /msg X set url and fix it :)
Please forward this
message to the CService site coding team, thank you!
Hello,
Just noticed that
you added back some of the Live details. One minor correction: the link to my
web site appears as http://cservice.undernet.org/live/www.websurf.ro/personal , probably because of a
forgotten
At 05:18 PM 7/20/2001, you wrote:
> > Well its a good idea (to make one that represents the commonailities of the
> > big4 minus IRCnet of course). Is there a mailing list for this 'review' ?
>
>I'm not yet familiar enough with that section of the IETF to be able to
>tell you. I imagine it would
> Well its a good idea (to make one that represents the commonailities of the
> big4 minus IRCnet of course). Is there a mailing list for this 'review' ?
I'm not yet familiar enough with that section of the IETF to be able to
tell you. I imagine it would be the IESG's internal mailing list, thou
Well I think it's all here :
http://www.rfc-editor.org/overview.html
BoD
- Original Message -
From: "rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 4:52 PM
Subject: A decent RFC (was Re: [Coder-Com] +ei modes)
>
> Well its a good idea (to make one that r
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas R. Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>How do I install this chat server on Free-BSD?
Try this:
http://www.coder-com.undernet.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ircu2.10/INS
TALL?
-=-peas-=-
- Original Message -
From: "Kev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Well I'm not sure of it, but I think anybody can write an RFC ?
> > So maybe undernet should try to do that, so we could say our server is
> > rfc-compliant :)
>
> There is a review process involved, I believe, but I would like to
- Original Message -
From: "Kristian Trenskow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've read the RFC 2812 and 2813
Please disregard those rogue documents. They were developed for IRCnet
_only_ by IRCnet _only with no consultation to/with ther majority of the
ircd developers and hence they represent no
--- blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>Hya,i have a one question from undernet's raw commands,
>My Question is;What is /Proto command,
> Thanks for interests...
> Blue Express,Turkey.
>
_
Visit http://www
> Well I'm not sure of it, but I think anybody can write an RFC ?
> So maybe undernet should try to do that, so we could say our server is
> rfc-compliant :)
There is a review process involved, I believe, but I would like to do that.
But I would not like to repeat IRCNet's slap in the face (exce
> That said, is there a big difference in specs? Would it be possible to
> bridge the gap in upcoming ircu releases (at least the non conflicting
> features)?
I'm not particularly interested in implementing those RFCs exactly. One
of them, for instance, specifies a server<->server protocol.
> I've read the RFC 2812 and 2813, and found out, that the RFC actually
> mentions setting exception lists and invite lists in channels (+ie
> followed by a mask), and found out that the ircu doesn't support this.
> I'm using the QuakeNet network which runs ircu, but with a patch, and
> I'm not aw
Well I'm not sure of it, but I think anybody can write an RFC ?
So maybe undernet should try to do that, so we could say our server is
rfc-compliant :)
BoD
- Original Message -
From: "Perry Lorier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 20
> I understand there's considerable animosity towards the "other"
> codebranch that the new rfc's were written against, especially since our
> input wasn't sought.
>
> That said, is there a big difference in specs? Would it be possible to
> bridge the gap in upcoming ircu releases (at lea
How do I install this chat server on
Free-BSD?
15 matches
Mail list logo
