I'm welaware the banlimit is a local server limit and is only valid for
clients.
I was merely trying to launch the idea of raising the internal X banlist
from 40 to 50-80.
It would be a shortterm fix for larger channels (and one that doesn't
involve ircu changes).
/Gen
- Original Message ---
Hello.
If you make a low level ban in X (<75) it deops people
without saying who did it. My proposal is to make X
notice victims about the user who set that ban... like
on deop (you are deoped on channel #... by ...).
Thanks.
Best regards,
Cosmin (JL` @ irc)
___
since when does mschat use irc protocol? (k, it vaguely looks like irc
protocol) >:)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 26 October 2002 11:40, Tom Rons wrote:
> last parameter may be prefixed with a colon. Chances are MS Chat is not
> (fully) RFC compliant, and IIRC it is no longer being maintained by
> Microsoft either :/
MS Chat was never very IR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 26 October 2002 11:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wanted to insert the haloween language (id = 15 in table languages) into
> the cservice db today, but I noted that language_id 15 in table
> translations is already taken by hebrew ...
> and when someone in the room leaves or disconnects either on
> mirc/pirch/mschat
> it takes all the mschat users with them, they all disconnect as well
> they are die hard users of mschat and they did not have these
> problems on
> the undernet
> till recently, like maybe the last month or less
I wanted to insert the haloween language (id = 15 in table languages) into
the cservice db today, but I noted that language_id 15 in table translations
is already taken by hebrew ...
--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ M
