On Thursday, Aug 21, 2003, at 13:27 Pacific/Auckland, stoney` wrote:
Hi,
Cservice frowns upon users having multiple usernames. If you suspect
someone of using multiple usernames, stop by #cservice to report the
infraction.
stoney`
or better yet, log it and email it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMA
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 10:40 Pacific/Auckland, Richard Smith wrote:
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 09:03 Pacific/Auckland, L'archange
Eldianel wrote:
My server is ircu 2.10.11.04
and my X is CS6.0 !
I hate to point out the obvious, and i hope someone on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] really can hel
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 09:03 Pacific/Auckland, L'archange Eldianel
wrote:
My server is ircu 2.10.11.04
and my X is CS6.0 !
I hate to point out the obvious, and i hope someone on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] really can help you, but...
CS6.0 is not the X that Undernet has EVER used, for help with that
On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 12:09 Pacific/Auckland, Gavin Grieve
wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 10:00, Tim Ramsey wrote:
Frederik Vervaet wrote:
Will be abused instantly. For example : users on a shared uni
network behind
NAT will have same [EMAIL PROTECTED] thus allowing them to collide other
and may be legally
privileged.
If you have received it in error you must not use, disclose, copy or
retain
it. Please immediately notify us by return email and then delete the
email.
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner with McAfee UVScan, and is bel
MAXCHANS: bots should always assume 10 channel on undernet, some
servers happen to allow more, and there has been 1 case to my knowledge
where a server admin had chosen to only allow 5 channels. But this
setting is really up to the server's own administrator.
MAXBANS: this has recently been cha
>
> well a decent e-mail client and a little bit of patience on behalf of the
> end user, can easily delete,filter spam.
>
> i have many filters, annoying as they are to set up, but at least it does
> it's job 90-95% of the time. (of course spammers are tricky and that 5-10%
> always gets through
>> opers that have that much time to offer... And he would need to act during
>> the attack, fact that is quite problematic since the pples who are attacked
>> aren't online at the moment of the attack.
>
> how about having in cservice, for each account, the last few logins with
> real nick!user@h
> I still have difficulties about the concept of considering the idea of
> showing IPs to ops on a channel a security breach, but i heard some
> interesting ideas in the few last days...
1. First of all, due to the privacy concerns coder-com really isnt the place
for this, it's up to the undernet
> cheers nighty
>
> how about the country thing then?
>
> perhaps put romaniuhhh or canaduhhh on all of them?
>
> just kidding =)
>
> anyway
>
> - wensu
As a New Zealander I can say, sad news is... Like some small ISP's, some
countries can't afford it either.
--
http://www.mediadesign
OK, my apologies, i did not know there was an oper /clearmode
available. i was talking about using /msg x clearmode #channel
where unless something has changed that i do not know about, what i
have said holds true.
--
Regards
Richard Smith
Media Design School Technician
--
http
On Monday, Nov 11, 2002, at 09:51 Pacific/Auckland, The Storm Surfer
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:52:14PM -0500, Kev wrote:
Little thing: CLEARMODE doesn't remove channelmode +r ...
+r is intentionally left out of the default control string.
how come?
Perhaps because if you can use
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 11:19 am, peter green wrote:
>
>> however i don't like hidden host at all because it means if you ban a user
>> they can just get a new X account and come back. some isp's give users an
>> entire subdomain to themselves
> At 23:34 13/10/2002, you wrote:
>> Before we get too carried away, this bug is on the server season`d is on,
>> not diemen.*, and it actually looks like someone has specifically hacked
>> mesa's code.
>
> i'd not worry for mesa* if i were you if its bugged
> it more than certain than its more t
Before we get too carried away, this bug is on the server season`d is on,
not diemen.*, and it actually looks like someone has specifically hacked
mesa's code.
mesa.* is using u2.10.11.02 and I tested and confirmed this from elsene.*
which is also using u2.10.11.02 and doesn't have this bug.
See
mmended to run ircd as root, create a special user to run
it as, then run it.
--
Regards
Richard Smith
Media Design School Technician
--
http://www.mediadesign.school.nz/
CAUTION: This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.
If you have received it in error you must not use,
hmmm:
Channel has 2000 users in it with,
5 ops
5 voiced
Anyone whose anyone knows that if someone were to join that channel from
anything less than a dual channel ISDN line (and probably including) is not
going to handle the flood of /names, and the ensuing irc clients doing
things like /who or
Due to the nature of IRC's client<->server protocol, the join/parts are a
must, but because of the server and traffic load, setting (and in particular
removing) a channel mode to do this is probably not practical, how about
creating a new channel type, that is global (like # and + channels) but is
As inserted:
> From: Valcor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:16:51 -0500
> To: Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser
>
> Hello xplora,
>
> I'm not a very good coder, and have personally not even attempted
Sorry but CService aren't interested, (I know I've been asking for ages, and
I'm on the inside, but you can work around this simply by regularly
monitoring /msg x info yourusername), and I am told that X is already being
"taxed" to much on login.
(although my way around that was simply to add a s
Regarding *!*@*.* see Isomer's email. There IS enough security.
Regarding what to do when your username is hacked on undernet...
First, go to http://cservice.undernet.org/live/ login (if you still can) and
change your password, if you cannot login, use forgotten password (link both
in side bar a
on 30/4/02 08:50, éL NìçoS at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Coders,
>
> I also have a suggestion. Large channels often deal with floods. Most off
> those large channels prefer to put two or three eggdrops online to protect
> themselves against the floodhosts. On most off these channels the banlis
"last modified:" in the user lists and ban lists is letting \'s in the
nick!user@host (usually just the nick where nicks can have \'s in them) be
processed (ie \n is cutting off the rest of the line, most other variations
are at least hiding the \ and code attached)
--
xplora @ undernet
on 18/4/02 06:15, Chojin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Chojin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Ban/Kill with fingerprint
>
>
>> On
the email.
Note: Unless stated this email does not represent Media Design School Ltd.
> From: Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:05:07 +1200
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] I have a problem with ircu.
>
> this is 2.10.11
this is 2.10.11 latest beta on MacOS X after doing make
cc -g -O3 -pipe -I. -I.. -I../include -c ircd.c -o ircd.o
ircd.c:455: illegal expression, found `)'
cpp-precomp: warning: errors during smart preprocessing, retrying in basic
mode
ircd.c: In function `parse_command_line':
ircd.c:455: parse
this has not changed since the old X... you have enough access to remove the
ban on the channel but not enough access to remove the ban in X, result, X
removes the channel, but notify's you that you cannot remove the ban in X.
--
Richard T Smith - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technician, Media Design Schoo
20 in 2 minutes (it's the privmsg/notice too many targets).
question has to be tho, why are you creating a "cyclebot"... reason i say
this is while i can think of and know of a few reasons to do this, i should
also warn you that mass-advertising is not allowed or liked on undernet, and
all inform
1. it is a very bad idea (as already stated in the other replies) to have
the server disable it's built in flood protection.
2. putquick is a tcl command used by an eggdrop bot, if you are outputting
notices, that are 10 lines long you are more likely to flood the bot off,
than get the message th
best way to handle would require a way of detaching the suspension from
access list, that way if the access is removed then re-added the suspension
remains (probably require a separate suspension table that would mimic the
access list except only have entries for actual suspensions)
--
xplora is
and the number of reasons why there isn't one out number the reason for 1 by
50 to 1, and they all pertain to abusing X.
wish we could have it, but it is just not a good idea.
--
xplora is wakco (Richard T Smith) yeehaa, doggy... b44w00f
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Official CService Admin,
Undernet Cha
NewNet (i think is the one, i'm sure its some NNet irc network)
is the only IRC network those RFC's actually refer to, and none OTHER (that
i know of, unless they are specifically using that networks server code). I
suggest you write the creator of those RFC's to find out where to get the
server c
this would be better sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] do not decide on anything you are asking about, they
only implement that which is asked for in the server's by the Server admins,
with a select few implementing in X what CService asks for.
considering invite only lets you invite y
no.
http://cservice.undernet.org/live/ uses php3
--
Richard T Smith (aka xplora or wakco on Undernet IRC Network)
Technician, Media Design School
Official CService Admin, Undernet Channel Service Committee
Work: [EMAIL
... and that would account for internet congestion how?
--
Richard T Smith (aka xplora or wakco on Undernet IRC Network)
Technician, Media Design School
Official CService Admin, Undernet Channel Service Committee
Work:
35 matches
Mail list logo
