itschrispeck commented on PR #12909:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/12909#issuecomment-2052249401
Is `info` the right default level for this log? My thinking was `debug`
might be more apt as default given the potentially high volume, and users could
override the level if needed.
gortiz commented on PR #12909:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/12909#issuecomment-2051444563
You don't need to modify the source code to change a log. Instead I would
recommend to modify the log4j2.xml file you are using to disable the logging on
this class (or change it to warn).
codecov-commenter commented on PR #12909:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/12909#issuecomment-2050807216
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/12909?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&u
itschrispeck opened a new pull request, #12909:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/12909
Per record level logging is pretty expensive, this log line emits >95% of
our logs. I believe changing it to debug level is reasonable.
tags: `refactor`
--
This is an automated message
