Re: [PR] Use different approach for Shortcircuit tests [airflow]
kaxil merged PR #47822: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47822 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [PR] Use different approach for Shortcircuit tests [airflow]
kaxil commented on PR #47822: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47822#issuecomment-2727248387 > > Hmm.. Still `something is not yes` as my friend used to say > > huh looking Found it, fixing! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [PR] Use different approach for Shortcircuit tests [airflow]
kaxil commented on PR #47822: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47822#issuecomment-2727248140 > Hmm.. Still `something is not yes` as my friend used to say huh looking -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [PR] Use different approach for Shortcircuit tests [airflow]
potiuk commented on PR #47822: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47822#issuecomment-2727247711 Hmm.. Still `something is not yes` as my friend used to say -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
[PR] Use different approach for Shortcircuit tests [airflow]
kaxil opened a new pull request, #47822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47822
This tests have been intermittently failing on main. Example:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/13878831286/job/38835225048
This PR changes the approach for the tests. We only really care about when
an exception is raised, so the logic is updated accordingly.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party
License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a
newsfragment file, named `{pr_number}.significant.rst` or
`{issue_number}.significant.rst`, in
[newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/newsfragments).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
