Re: [I] Clean `airflow.utils` and move DAG definition items to Task SDK [airflow]

2026-02-11 Thread via GitHub


amoghrajesh commented on issue #51671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/51671#issuecomment-3889198060

   The remaining items have been moved to a new epic: 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/61803 which will be handled after 3.2, 
closing this one now


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Clean `airflow.utils` and move DAG definition items to Task SDK [airflow]

2026-02-11 Thread via GitHub


amoghrajesh closed issue #51671: Clean `airflow.utils` and move DAG definition 
items to Task SDK
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/51671


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Clean `airflow.utils` and move DAG definition items to Task SDK [airflow]

2026-02-03 Thread via GitHub


amoghrajesh commented on issue #51671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/51671#issuecomment-3844937182

   The two pending items are related to dag.test here


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Clean `airflow.utils` and move DAG definition items to Task SDK [airflow]

2025-10-21 Thread via GitHub


KoviAnusha commented on issue #51671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/51671#issuecomment-3430683782

   As you all are making these changes, is it already documented somewhere? or 
shall I work on documentation?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Clean `airflow.utils` and move DAG definition items to Task SDK [airflow]

2025-07-18 Thread via GitHub


sunank200 commented on issue #51671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/51671#issuecomment-3089206125

   For 3.1,  the goal is not to strictly remove `airflow.utils` but the goal is 
to remove imports of sdk from core.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Clean `airflow.utils` and move DAG definition items to Task SDK [airflow]

2025-06-13 Thread via GitHub


kaxil commented on issue #51671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/51671#issuecomment-2970113529

   Yeah, I think so, but I think we can have one in `airflow/utils/__init__.py` 
similar to 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow-core/src/airflow/operators/__init__.py


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Clean `airflow.utils` and move DAG definition items to Task SDK [airflow]

2025-06-13 Thread via GitHub


uranusjr commented on issue #51671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/51671#issuecomment-2969890045

   Do we need to maintain backward compatibility and keep shims in the module?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]