Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-08 Thread via GitHub


matthieuauger commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3627473397

   I don't know if this is new or not but I also faced this exact same issue 
for the first time ever 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3622473200
   
   I never had this issue before in the last months so it may be related to 
3.1.4


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-08 Thread via GitHub


choo121600 commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3627240845

   This is a known issue, and as far as I know it was resolved through 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/56892
   Clearing cookies and refreshing the page should fix the problem.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-08 Thread via GitHub


gvergnolle commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3627209601

   @jscheffl I've seen issues like these before, and usually opening Airflow in 
private mode seems to remove the 500


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-07 Thread via GitHub


choo121600 commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3625147443

   My changes looks good ;)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-07 Thread via GitHub


bugraoz93 commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3622478696

   My changes looks good! Development and CI related 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-07 Thread via GitHub


jscheffl commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3622473200

   As per devlist _technically_ all looks good, checked bugs but failed 
miserably in opening browser UI after fresh start with a browser and an 
expired/invalid JWT token, got a HTTP 500. Started via breeze with command
   
   breeze start-airflow --python 3.12 --load-example-dags --backend postgres 
--executor EdgeExecutor --answer y --use-airflow-version 3.1.3 
--use-distributions-from-dist
   
   And opening browser (as of breeze requiring a new session) expected a login 
page but received an "INTERNAL SERVER ERROR". Some fix in JWT token handling 
seems to generate an exception instead of forwarding to login page. In view 
this is not acceptable as we must expect invalid sessions from users and need 
to redirect to login page. Exception seen in breeze tmux panel for API server:
   
   2025-12-07T15:56:23.562782Z [error] JWT token is not valid: Signature 
verification failed [airflow.api_fastapi.auth.managers.base_auth_manager] 
loc=base_auth_manager.py:107
   INFO: 172.18.0.1:34366 - "GET / HTTP/1.1" 500 Internal Server Error
   ERROR:Exception in ASGI application
 + Exception Group Traceback (most recent call last):
 |   File "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/_utils.py", 
line 79, in collapse_excgroups
 | yield
 |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/middleware/base.py", line 
183, in __call__
 | async with anyio.create_task_group() as task_group:
 |^
 |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/anyio/_backends/_asyncio.py", line 
783, in __aexit__
 | raise BaseExceptionGroup(
 | ExceptionGroup: unhandled errors in a TaskGroup (1 sub-exception)
 +-+ 1 
   | Traceback (most recent call last):
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/uvicorn/protocols/http/httptools_impl.py",
 line 409, in run_asgi
   | result = await app(  # type: ignore[func-returns-value]
   |  ^^
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/fastapi/applications.py", line 1082, 
in __call__
   | await super().__call__(scope, receive, send)
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/applications.py", line 113, 
in __call__
   | await self.middleware_stack(scope, receive, send)
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/middleware/errors.py", line 
186, in __call__
   | raise exc
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/middleware/errors.py", line 
164, in __call__
   | await self.app(scope, receive, _send)
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/middleware/gzip.py", line 
29, in __call__
   | await responder(scope, receive, send)
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/middleware/gzip.py", line 
130, in __call__
   | await super().__call__(scope, receive, send)
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/middleware/gzip.py", line 
46, in __call__
   | await self.app(scope, receive, self.send_with_compression)
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/middleware/cors.py", line 
85, in __call__
   | await self.app(scope, receive, send)
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/middleware/base.py", line 
182, in __call__
   | with recv_stream, send_stream, collapse_excgroups():
   |
   |   File "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/contextlib.py", line 158, in 
__exit__
   | self.gen.throw(value)
   |   File "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/_utils.py", 
line 85, in collapse_excgroups
   | raise exc
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/middleware/base.py", line 
184, in __call__
   | response = await self.dispatch_func(request, call_next)
   |
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/api_fastapi/auth/middlewares/refresh_token.py",
 line 45, in dispatch
   | new_user = await self._refresh_user(current_token)
   |^^^
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/api_fastapi/auth/middlewares/refresh_token.py",
 line 67, in _refresh_user
   | user = await resolve_user_from_token(current_token)
   |
   |   File 
"/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/api_fastapi/core_api/security.py",
 line 103, in resolve_user_from_token
   | raise HTTPException(status_code=status.HTTP_4

Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-07 Thread via GitHub


potiuk commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3622459644

   Checked all my changes, All look good ! The memory improvements look 
fantastic :) 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-06 Thread via GitHub


matthieuauger commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3619927316

   I'd say #57880 partially fixes the problem. There is no problem anymore with 
day and month fields, but there is still an issue with the year field as 
mentioned here: 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/57880#pullrequestreview-3434808232
   
   If you fill completely one of the datetime fields, then focus back on the 
year it doesn't work properly.
   
   Should I create another issue?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-05 Thread via GitHub


Lee-W commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3619411073

   https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/58192, 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/58773 works as expected 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-05 Thread via GitHub


nailo2c commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3619393883

   Hi, I've tested #58115 from my local device, and it works well. Thank you!
   
   https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/afa64929-7136-43f9-9b77-404112680ee4";
 />


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-04 Thread via GitHub


ephraimbuddy commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3615647533

   Thanks @wjddn279 !


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-04 Thread via GitHub


wjddn279 commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3615023368

   I deployed both the 3.1.3 version image and the 3.1.4rc1 image 
simultaneously using docker compose to test the following PR 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/58365, and after running 88,100 tasks 
over 14 hours, I compared the memory usage per process of the scheduler.
   
   As a result, I confirmed that the existing memory usage of 3.9GiB was 
reduced to 1.6GiB.
   
   
   | airflow:3.1.3 | airflow:3.1.4rc1 |
   |---|---|
   | https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4cb2804e-77a5-4060-aa77-8988d745d294";
 />|https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/799700ba-80ef-4803-9056-604f500eeafb";
 />|
   
   ```
   CONTAINER ID   NAME   CPU % MEM USAGE / 
LIMIT MEM % NET I/O   BLOCK I/O PIDS
   0a8484d2f548   af_test2-airflow-scheduler-1   0.81% 1.743GiB / 
19.49GiB   8.94% 18.8GB / 10.7GB   656MB / 2.35GB40
   5f1ab497195d   af_test-airflow-scheduler-12.02% 4.047GiB / 
19.49GiB   20.76%22.4GB / 12.1GB   638MB / 9.37GB40
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-04 Thread via GitHub


ephraimbuddy commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3610965850

   > Hello [@ephraimbuddy](https://github.com/ephraimbuddy), I'd be happy to 
test it. Is there a docker image for this RC1? I looked at the docker registry 
but didn't find it. Thanks
   
   The docker image is still building and would be pushed registry in few 
minutes


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] Status of testing of Apache Airflow 3.1.4rc1 and Task SDK 1.1.4rc1 [airflow]

2025-12-04 Thread via GitHub


matthieuauger commented on issue #59033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59033#issuecomment-3610953555

   Hello @ephraimbuddy, I'd be happy to test it. Is there a docker image for 
this RC1? I looked at the docker registry but didn't find it 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]