Re: [PR] Fix depreccated DagBag import from models.dagbag [airflow]

2025-12-02 Thread via GitHub


github-actions[bot] commented on PR #58938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/58938#issuecomment-3603306596

   ### Backport successfully created: v3-1-test
   
   
   
   Status
   Branch
   Result
   
   
   ✅
   v3-1-test
   https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/58964";>https://img.shields.io/badge/PR-58964-blue"; alt="PR Link">
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [PR] Fix depreccated DagBag import from models.dagbag [airflow]

2025-12-02 Thread via GitHub


ephraimbuddy merged PR #58938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/58938


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [PR] Fix depreccated DagBag import from models.dagbag [airflow]

2025-12-02 Thread via GitHub


ephraimbuddy commented on PR #58938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/58938#issuecomment-3602092025

   > This still means something is doing `from airflow.models import DagBag` 
doesn't it?
   > 
   > Should it be importing this, or the `DBDagBag` one?
   
   Addressed the PR as discussed


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]