Re: [PR] Use different approach for Shortcircuit tests [airflow]
kaxil merged PR #47822: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47822 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [PR] Use different approach for Shortcircuit tests [airflow]
kaxil commented on PR #47822: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47822#issuecomment-2727248387 > > Hmm.. Still `something is not yes` as my friend used to say > > huh looking Found it, fixing! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [PR] Use different approach for Shortcircuit tests [airflow]
kaxil commented on PR #47822: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47822#issuecomment-2727248140 > Hmm.. Still `something is not yes` as my friend used to say huh looking -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [PR] Use different approach for Shortcircuit tests [airflow]
potiuk commented on PR #47822: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47822#issuecomment-2727247711 Hmm.. Still `something is not yes` as my friend used to say -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
