Re: [I] After upgrade to 4.22.0.0 snapshot.delta.max not respected [cloudstack]
sureshanaparti commented on issue #12524: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/12524#issuecomment-4221051781 Fixed in #12597 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [I] After upgrade to 4.22.0.0 snapshot.delta.max not respected [cloudstack]
sureshanaparti closed issue #12524: After upgrade to 4.22.0.0 snapshot.delta.max not respected URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/12524 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [I] After upgrade to 4.22.0.0 snapshot.delta.max not respected [cloudstack]
nvazquez commented on issue #12524: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/12524#issuecomment-3853475294 Thanks @JoaoJandre for your investigation and the fix PR - will review it -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [I] After upgrade to 4.22.0.0 snapshot.delta.max not respected [cloudstack]
JoaoJandre commented on issue #12524: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/12524#issuecomment-3849420368 Hello, @nxsbi I was able to reproduce the problem. This happens when the number of snapshots configured to be kept for the policies is lower than the `snapshot.delta.max` configuration, what happens is that the chain is never ended and thus the older snapshots are never removed in order to keep the newer ones valid. I will create a PR to fix this in 4.22.1.0. The workaround that I would suggest is setting the maximum number of snapshots for the user snapshot policies to be the same as the value of `snapshot.delta.max`. This will ensure that a full snapshot chain is created and finished each cycle and the older snapshot chains will be deleted. Could you test and check if this workaround works for you? @nvazquez This affects only XCP-ng, the snapshot creation logic is different for KVM. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [I] After upgrade to 4.22.0.0 snapshot.delta.max not respected [cloudstack]
JoaoJandre commented on issue #12524: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/12524#issuecomment-3847305105 > Hi [@nxsbi](https://github.com/nxsbi) thanks for reporting the issue. An additional question, before the upgrade did you see these 'Hidden' entries on database, or were them removed? > > On 4.21 the KVM incremental snapshot feature has been introduced ([#8907](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8907)) which seems to do a similar approach leaving Hidden entries on database but not removing them from storage, is it possible that its also the default behavior now for Xen/XCP? [@sureshanaparti](https://github.com/sureshanaparti) [@JoaoJandre](https://github.com/JoaoJandre) [@DaanHoogland](https://github.com/DaanHoogland) @nvazquez As far as I remember the logic for snapshot creation and removal is the same for KVM and Xen. I'll try to reproduce the issue on 4.22 using XCP-ng. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [I] After upgrade to 4.22.0.0 snapshot.delta.max not respected [cloudstack]
DaanHoogland commented on issue #12524: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/12524#issuecomment-3811231000 @nvazquez , do we need to check this in 20.2 as well? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [I] After upgrade to 4.22.0.0 snapshot.delta.max not respected [cloudstack]
nxsbi commented on issue #12524: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/12524#issuecomment-3807150384 Hi @nvazquez Before upgrade the data reflected only two values - Destroyed or BackedUp (or Ready) I did not do any extra steps around this. Related to this - I had originally reported a related issue - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9501 This one is same issue, except that now there are no Full snapshots every 7 days at all. I used to be able to determine which is a Full snapshot based on Parent ID = 0 (in snapshot_store_ref) and now I no longer see that. I also reviewed the actual snapshot sizes and there is no large files except the one from before upgrade. Not sure if any other xcp-ng + cloudstack users can comment -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
Re: [I] After upgrade to 4.22.0.0 snapshot.delta.max not respected [cloudstack]
nvazquez commented on issue #12524: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/12524#issuecomment-3806619899 Hi @nxsbi thanks for reporting the issue. An additional question, before the upgrade did you see these 'Hidden' entries on database, or were them removed? On 4.21 the KVM incremental snapshot feature has been introduced (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8907) which seems to do a similar approach leaving Hidden entries on database but not removing them from storage, is it possible that its also the default behavior now for Xen/XCP? @sureshanaparti @JoaoJandre @DaanHoogland -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
