Oki
actually that is the basic reason for me looking into digester that deep.
I'm still fumbling with the clustering stuff (And I tossed it in another
package following Remys feelings about transactions and cluster in tomcat).
However I need some way to plug into tomcat, I do that by creating
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote:
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:25:22 +0100
> From: Mika Goeckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Self configuring Objects or is it po
Hey fast man! :-)
Yes, I've figured out how to extend digester to call that sort of method i
was after. And I found the problem you mentioned.
A way around that would involve passing the match variable to the rules. An
object then would have it's position in the tree.
The goal I'm after is to en
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote:
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:35:58 +0100
> From: Mika Goeckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Self configuring Objects or is it possible to change the rule
> set du
Hi!
Is it possible to add rules to the ruleset of a digester after the parse has been
started?
The reason for that is, that it would enable us to put the knowledge about child
objects within something like a configure() method of a just created object.
For example if someone creates a complic
Hi,
Goal:
I am trying to create a 'generic' form bean for use with my Struts actions.
The form bean will make use of the Beanutils' good features such as mapped
properties and nested properties.
To achieve that, I am finding a need for Beanutils to dynamically create
beans for nested-mapped prope
hi james
i'd like to start adding some enhancements to betwixt. my starting to do
list is:
1. add property getter and setter for the XMLIntrospector used by
BeanWriter. (allowing the introspection behaviour to be altered)
2. add a very simple logging method (probably just a log(String) method
On Wednesday, December 12, 2001, at 08:18 AM, Christoph Reck wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> you'll probably wonder why the method is called invokeExactMethod (rather
>> than invokeMethod, say). that's because i plan to add another method that
>> searches for a correctly named method wit
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> you'll probably wonder why the method is called invokeExactMethod (rather
> than invokeMethod, say). that's because i plan to add another method that
> searches for a correctly named method with compatible parameters (rather
> than exact matching) but i though that i
