Re: [Digester] Asymmetry between ObjectCreateRule and FactoryCreateRule

Great - thanks, Robert. -- Martin Cooper - Original Message - From: "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: Re: [Digester] Asymmetry between ObjectCreateRule and FactoryCreateRu

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix/native arguments.c

jfclere 02/03/13 15:09:49 Modified:daemon/src/native/unix/native arguments.c Log: Allow -remote option to be the only option. Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +2 -2 jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix/native/arguments.c Index: arguments.c ==

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/nt/service instmain.c Makefile instmain.cpp

jfclere 02/03/13 15:07:31 Modified:daemon/src/native/nt/service Makefile Added: daemon/src/native/nt/service instmain.c Removed: daemon/src/native/nt/service instmain.cpp Log: Change the C++ file to a C file. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +7 -3 jakart

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7091] New: - Header value/name swapped when more than one value is set for a header on a HttpResponse

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[jdbc] ManualPoolingDataSourceExample works with JDBC3.0

Progress 1: ManualPoolingDataSourceExample works fine with the classes from JDBC-3.0 (JDK1.4) Sincerely, -- Lev AssinovskyPeterlink Web ProgrammerSt. Petersburg, Russia Tel/Fax: +7 812 3275343 197022 ul.Chapigina 7Á E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsu

Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4

I attached the classes modified for JSK 1.4/JDBC 3.0 Use it as you want. -- Lev AssinovskyPeterlink Web ProgrammerSt. Petersburg, Russia Tel/Fax: +7 812 3275343 197022 ul.Chapigina 7Á E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] dbcp_jdbc3.0.tar.gz Description: GNU Zip

Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4

Tomasz Pik wrote: > > otisg wrote: > > > I think this would be a good thing to have in the interim. > > I'd suggest you post the patches here and hopefully somebody with commit > > priviledges can apply them. > > Maybe it will be better to produce two versions of package > (JDK 1.4- and JDK 1.4

[patch] beanutils: custom converters for convertutils

Hi there, Here's a patch which provides support for custom converters in ConvertUtils. It allows registering an object implementing the Converter interface as a converter for a certain class. It's pretty simple but can be useful, so I hope it can be included in beanutils. greets, Klaasjan Bra

Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4

Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > Question: if you added a method > > public Savepoint setSavepoint(String name) throws SQLException > > how is this going to compile with JSDK 1.3? java.sql.Savepoint was only > added in 1.4 > > Lev Assinovsky wrote: > > Since JDK 1.4 includes JDBC 3.0 > > I added all

Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4

Hi, Try reflection to generate "wrappers" . It is very trivial to implement since JKD1.3 , and I think it is better to forget JDK1.2 in the next DBCP version. > > > otisg wrote: > > > I think this would be a good thing to have in the interim. > > I'd suggest you post the patches here and hopeful

Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4

Heh, it won't. Where's my coffee...? Sending the patches may still be goo, to save those with 1.4 some work doing the same thing to compile DBCP under 1.4. Otis ___ Get your own FREE email account at iVillage.com! http://webmail.ivillag

Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4

otisg wrote: > I think this would be a good thing to have in the interim. > I'd suggest you post the patches here and hopefully somebody with commit > priviledges can apply them. Maybe it will be better to produce two versions of package (JDK 1.4- and JDK 1.4), in the similar to Cactus way (S

Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4

Question: if you added a method public Savepoint setSavepoint(String name) throws SQLException how is this going to compile with JSDK 1.3? java.sql.Savepoint was only added in 1.4 Lev Assinovsky wrote: > Since JDK 1.4 includes JDBC 3.0 > I added all additional functions with a body like: >

Re: httpclient: timeout

I have tried this before. It did not work for me under IBM's 1.3.1 JVM and Linux. Otis ___ Get your own FREE email account at iVillage.com! http://webmail.ivillage.com/ <-Original Message-> From: Mohammad M. Purbo Sent: 3/13/20

Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4

I think this would be a good thing to have in the interim. I'd suggest you post the patches here and hopefully somebody with commit priviledges can apply them. Thanks, Otis ___ Get your own FREE email account at iVillage.com! http://webm

[dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4

Since JDK 1.4 includes JDBC 3.0 I added all additional functions with a body like: { throw new SQLException("Not implemented."); } to be able to compile in JDK 1.4. The following files were modified (in my local box): ./src/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp/DelegatingConnection.java ./src/java/org/

Re: [collections] doc's build problem

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Lev Assinovsky wrote: > Hello! > I found that when run "ant dist": > > [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc information... > [javadoc] Standard Doclet version 1.4.0 The messages you are seeing are just warnings. They should be fixed, but they shouldn't prevent you from being

Re: [collections] One test failed

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Lev Assinovsky wrote: > Hi Michael! > May be it's interesting for you? > I made cvs update (for collections) and > run ant (jdk 1.4). Yup. I mentioned this yesterday afternoon, just didn't have a chance last night to get to them. "I've seen this as well, and is actually

RE: Please Release commons logging --

meee too. On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 02:01, Scott Sanders wrote: > Was the announcement made and I just missed it? > > Scott > > > -Original Message- > > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:02 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List >

Re: Please Release commons logging --

Ahh sorry, in all the many messages I got around that time, I missed the one that actually released it! On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 23:01, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > On 12 Mar 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > > Date: 12 Mar 2002 21:58:37 -0500 > > From: Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/altrmi/src/java/org/apache/commons/altrmi/server/impl/socket PartialSocketCustomStreamServer.java

hammant 02/03/13 04:21:17 Modified:altrmi/src/java/org/apache/commons/altrmi/server/impl/socket PartialSocketCustomStreamServer.java Log: Fix mismatch between custom and object streams. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +5 -5 jakarta-commons-sa

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/altrmi/src/java/org/apache/commons/altrmi/server/impl/socket PartialSocketObjectStreamServer.java

hammant 02/03/13 02:24:08 Modified:altrmi/src/java/org/apache/commons/altrmi/server/impl/socket PartialSocketObjectStreamServer.java Log: Extra constructor for those with their own Invocation adapters Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +17 -1 jak

[collections] doc's build problem

Hello! I found that when run "ant dist": [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc information... [javadoc] Standard Doclet version 1.4.0 [javadoc] [javadoc] Building tree for all the packages and classes... [javadoc] Building index for all the packages and classes... [javadoc] /tmp/buildtemp_2