Re: [sandbox] Karma request

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Bill Barker wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 20:05:03 -0800 > From: Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [sandbox] Karma request > > Could I get karma for sandbox for billbarker? Th

Re: [sandbox] Karma request

Just in case nothing happens, try repeating this mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail list. That's the location for this kind of thing, but historically one of the people with the access is listening to this list too. Hen On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Bill Barker wrote: > Could I get karma for sandbox for

[sandbox] Karma request

Could I get karma for sandbox for billbarker? Thanks much. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [BeanUtils] auto construction and expansion of array

hello i can see the usefulness of this code in some particular cases but i'm not very keen on it's inclusion in a general library (at least in it's current form). arrays are dealt with by beanutils as part of more general indexed properties. PropertyUtils.setIndexedProperty allows entries in a

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient build.xml

olegk 2003/03/27 13:27:21 Modified:httpclient build.xml Log: Compilation process now includes examples & unsupported components Bug fix: #10817 (Provide more Example Code) Contributed by Oleg Kalnichevski Revision ChangesPath 1.26 +17 -1 jakarta-

RE: [logging] commons-logging and log4.configuration

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, SPRINGER,IAN (HP-NewJersey,ex1) wrote: > | > | More specifically, commons-logging explicitly declares > | configuration of > | the underlying logging implementation to be out of scope. > | > | > --Ian > | > > | > | Craig > > > Oh yes, you're right, I forgot to mention that.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16413] - XML interface for Digester.addCallParam(java.lang.String pattern, int paramIndex, boolean fromStack)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18012] - BasicDataSource doesn't include PreparedStmt Pooling

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/digester/src/test/org/apache/commons/digester/xmlrules CallParamTestObject.java test-call-param-rules.xml

rdonkin 2003/03/27 10:55:30 Added: digester/src/test/org/apache/commons/digester/xmlrules CallParamTestObject.java test-call-param-rules.xml Log: Added support for call-param from stack to xml rules.. Enhancement requested as bug #16413. Revision Cha

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/digester/src/test/org/apache/commons/digester/xmlrules DigesterLoaderTest.java

rdonkin 2003/03/27 10:54:45 Modified:digester/src/java/org/apache/commons/digester/xmlrules DigesterRuleParser.java digester-rules.dtd digester/src/test/org/apache/commons/digester/xmlrules DigesterLoaderTest.java Log: Ad

[beanutils] Re: [Bug 17036] - PropertyUtils doesn't recognise "normal" properties on a DynaBean descendent object.

hi gavin i think that commons-dev list is the best place to discuss this kind of thing. i'd recommend that you subscribe (so longer as you set up filters first since the volume's reasonably high) but if you don't, you can probably follow this thread by using the archives. you can post to list

RE: [logging] commons-logging and log4.configuration

| On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, SPRINGER,IAN (HP-NewJersey,ex1) wrote: | | > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:58:48 -0800 | > From: "SPRINGER,IAN (HP-NewJersey,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' | <[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [logging] commons-logging and log4.configuration

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, SPRINGER,IAN (HP-NewJersey,ex1) wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:58:48 -0800 > From: "SPRINGER,IAN (HP-NewJersey,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "MAZ

RE: [logging] commons-logging and log4.configuration

| > I don't think you want to make commons-logging.properties contain | > impl-specific config properties. Some impls might not even | use a properties | > file for their configuration - they might use XML or some | other format. | Well it might be nice to be able to specify the location of a con

RE: [logging] commons-logging and log4.configuration

> I don't think you want to make commons-logging.properties contain > impl-specific config properties. Some impls might not even use a properties > file for their configuration - they might use XML or some other format. Well it might be nice to be able to specify the location of a config file e.g.

RE: [logging] commons-logging and log4.configuration

| Hi, | | As I understand it, if I have a commons-logging.properties on my | classpath then the concrete logger will use this properties file | as its own configuration? I don't think this is true. | As it happens, I need to specify the log4.configuration system | property to make it pick up i

Re: [logging] commons-logging and log4.configuration

Just got a new keyboard and the 'j' key now works ;) Obviously, it should be log4j in the previous mails... -John K On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 16:10, John Keyes wrote: > Hi, > > As I understand it, if I have a commons-logging.properties on my > classpath then the concrete logger will use this propert

[logging] commons-logging and log4.configuration

Hi, As I understand it, if I have a commons-logging.properties on my classpath then the concrete logger will use this properties file as its own configuration? As it happens, I need to specify the log4.configuration system property to make it pick up its own configuration. Is this correct? Is

[NET] IP Address range check

I am currently searching a java class which can do an ip-address range (ip/subnet) check, but havent found one. Maybe one of you knows an class? If not, might it be interesting for the NET group to have such an util? I have to check if an address is within an given subnet. The syntax should be e

commons-validator design clarification

Hi all. I can't figure out, why all the entities (at commons-validator package) implemented extendable except FormSet which has private members??? (By saying entities I'm referring to Form; Field; Arg; Msg) I have some bug fixes and ideas I want to share with.

[GUMP] Build Failure - commons-jelly-tags-html

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml init: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rubys/j

[GUMP] Build Failure - commons-validator

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml init: [echo] validator 1.1-dev -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16676] - StackOverflow due to ToStringBuilder

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/lang/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/builder ToStringBuilderTest.java

ggregory2003/03/27 00:55:22 Modified:lang/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/builder ToStringBuilderTest.java Log: Fix bug 16676: StackOverflow due to ToStringBuilder (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16676) Revision ChangesPath 1.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder ToStringStyle.java ToStringBuilder.java

ggregory2003/03/27 00:54:32 Modified:lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder ToStringStyle.java ToStringBuilder.java Log: Fix bug 16676: StackOverflow due to ToStringBuilder (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16676) Revision Chang