[GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-commons/commons-logging failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-logging has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

workflow project ?

I'm new to this , so bear with me, workflow : is this project active ?? how do I get more info on it's development ? who is running with the development of this project ? many thanks Foad Momtazi email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[lang] StopWatch stop vs. split?

Hello The StopWatch method stop and split do the same thing. Why have both? It's confusing. Thanks, Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27523] - Can not compile under Fedora Core 1 AMD64

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [configuration] request for comments on refactoring

[2004-05-18 17:23] Emmanuel Bourg said: | Brent Verner wrote: | | > CURL - entry point for loading configurations. basically, | > a CURL is a primitive URL-like object takes a | > Configuration URL, i.e., | >file:/path/to/file.${EXTENSION} | >res:/path/to

Re: [logging][PROPOSAL] a solution to incompatibility between log4j versions

> i'm very open to suggestions about the best way to structure the build > scripts. You able to benefit from Ant 1.6 (or are they earlier?) selectors? Ant's own build file uses them (along with

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29054] - setTestOnReturn(boolean)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29054] - setTestOnReturn(boolean)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/dbcp/src/test/org/apache/commons/dbcp TestBasicDataSource.java

dirkv 2004/05/18 15:01:11 Modified:dbcp/src/test/org/apache/commons/dbcp TestBasicDataSource.java Log: access the internal connection pool through its proptected property (makes the test compile on DBCP 1.1) Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +4 -4

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/dbcp/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp BasicDataSource.java

dirkv 2004/05/18 14:59:53 Modified:dbcp/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp BasicDataSource.java Log: remove getConnectionPool method was not present in 1.1 and the pool should not be publicly accessible Revision ChangesPath 1.36 +1 -5 jakarta-commons/dbcp/src

[logging][PROPOSAL] a solution to incompatibility between log4j versions

the gump build of log4j has been failing over the last few days. this has (in turn) lead to a large number of downstream build failures. this has alerted us to the fact that we're fast approaching the time where we will have to deal with supporting three binary incompatible major versions of Lo

Re: [lang] Equalator?

See ComparatorChain in [collections]. The chain uses the second comparator if the first returns zero (equal), it uses the third comparator if the first and second return zero. Stephen - Original Message - From: "Inger, Matthew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Not really. It doesn't make sense to c

Re: [sandbox] active components?

hi oliver releases of sandbox components by the jakarta-common team are forbidden. (i believe that - with pmc approval - that slide could release a sandbox component for it's own purposes.) so, what's needed is promotion to the jakarta commons. of course, one of the major is that the component

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/xdocs features.xml

olegk 2004/05/18 13:41:01 Modified:httpclient/xdocs features.xml Log: Feature list updated to refect 3.0 alpha1 enhancements Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +7 -1 jakarta-commons/httpclient/xdocs/features.xml Index: features.xml ==

RE: [configuration] request for comments on refactoring

I think that these ideas actually make a lot of sense.. How many times has a ConfigurationChangedEvent been something you wanted? I have a stack of places where I manually nuke my configuration and reload it b/c I can't listen for events of any type.. Let's keep this thread moving, but let's n

RE: [lang] Equalator?

Not really. It doesn't make sense to chain comparalators with operations like and/or. Comparators are for comparing objects, and returning one of three values: Less Than Equal To Greater Than There's no way to logically chain these together. Chaining only makes sense wit

RE: [lang] Equalator?

The one thing I can do with an Equalator that I don't see how to do (in a meaningful way) with Comparators is chain them. I've implemented a ChainedOrEqualator that contains a list of Equalators. If one returns true, then the ChainedOrEqualator returns true. Likewise, there's a ChainedAndEqualator.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28358] - Problems on indexed property with JDK 1.4

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29054] - setTestOnReturn(boolean)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29055] - AutoCommit and ReadOnly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [configuration] request for comments on refactoring

Brent Verner wrote: CURL - entry point for loading configurations. basically, a CURL is a primitive URL-like object takes a Configuration URL, i.e., file:/path/to/file.${EXTENSION} res:/path/to/file.${EXTENSION} jdbc:${JDBC_URL} [1]

Re: [logging] jakarta-commons/commons-logging failed

After looking at this more carefully, there is indeed a runtime problem. I hope to find a solution preserving both compile time and run time compatibility. However, I have to finish another piece of work before targeting this problem. Hopefully, the problem will be fixed either tomorrow or on T

Re: [general] release instructions

Eric Pugh wrote: configuration has a build.xml that is periodically spit out using the Maven Ant goal, however, it then requires massaging and therefore never seems to keep up with the Maven build.. I believe that it exists only for the nightly build, is that correct? ...and for those pulling the

RE: [general] release instructions

configuration has a build.xml that is periodically spit out using the Maven Ant goal, however, it then requires massaging and therefore never seems to keep up with the Maven build.. I believe that it exists only for the nightly build, is that correct? I guess I'm asking: 1) What is required to g

[logging] jakarta-commons/commons-logging failed

First, this deprecation seems to be also taking down jakarta-velocity (for the same reason) and excalibur-logger (for a slightly new reason) and is responsible for affecting 249 projects. [That is the bad/good news]. http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/project_todos.html http://lsd.student.ut

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25661] - [configuration] reloadable configuration

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25661] - [configuration] reloadable configuration

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/transaction/src/java/org/apache/commons/transaction/memory TransactionalMapWrapper.java

ozeigermann2004/05/18 06:59:13 Modified:transaction/src/java/org/apache/commons/transaction/memory TransactionalMapWrapper.java Log: - more transaction control - refactored context to be a pure structure Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +122 -73

Re: [configuration] Accessing from EL script

[2004-05-18 09:20] Mark R. Diggory said: | Brent Verner wrote: | | >[2004-05-18 08:43] Mark R. Diggory said: | >| To extend the subject of refactoring. I want to be able to access | >| Configuration objects from EL references in JSP 2.0. | >| | >| ${sessionScope.config.foo.bar} | > | >I do somet

Re: [configuration] Accessing from EL script

Brent Verner wrote: [2004-05-18 08:43] Mark R. Diggory said: | To extend the subject of refactoring. I want to be able to access | Configuration objects from EL references in JSP 2.0. | | ${sessionScope.config.foo.bar} I do something similar _with_ properties configuration. The syntax I use is

Re: [configuration] Accessing from EL script

[2004-05-18 08:43] Mark R. Diggory said: | To extend the subject of refactoring. I want to be able to access | Configuration objects from EL references in JSP 2.0. | | ${sessionScope.config.foo.bar} I do something similar _with_ properties configuration. The syntax I use is ${sessionScope.

Re: [configuration] Accessing from EL script

Mark R. Diggory wrote: To extend the subject of refactoring. I want to be able to access Configuration objects from EL references in JSP 2.0. ${sessionScope.config.foo.bar} Is this at all possible right now? Currently, to do this in EL, config and foo need to either be Collections or Beans with

[configuration] Accessing from EL script

To extend the subject of refactoring. I want to be able to access Configuration objects from EL references in JSP 2.0. ${sessionScope.config.foo.bar} Is this at all possible right now? Currently, to do this in EL, config and foo need to either be Collections or Beans with getFoo and getBar meth

Re: [general] release instructions

Yes, a big CAUTION there. Many of the build.xml's are generated by maven or hand written, and many are still in use by developers. I'd really like to see something where (take collections for instance) maven.xml uses the ant build.xml script to either pregoal,goal,postgoal the dist goal, this

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/vfs build.xml

The command 'maven ant' will generate the build.xml file. Just so you know. Hen On Tue, 18 May 2004, Mario Ivankovits wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Isn't this a generated build file? > > > > > For sure it is (was) a generated build file. > I am not the one who generates them and i am s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28660] - [configuration] Lists in a CompositeConfiguration

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [configuration] request for comments on refactoring

[2004-05-18 12:35] Emmanuel Bourg said: | Brent Verner wrote: | | >org.apache.commons.configuration.event | > ConfigurationChangedListener - receives notification when a | > Configuration has changed | > ConfigurationChangedEvent - sent by a ConfigurationProvider | > when its Configura

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28660] - [configuration] Lists in a CompositeConfiguration

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28660] - [configuration] Lists in a CompositeConfiguration

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28274] - [configuration] Use of enum as variable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28660] - [configuration] Lists in a CompositeConfiguration

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [configuration] request for comments on refactoring

Brent Verner wrote: org.apache.commons.configuration.event ConfigurationChangedListener - receives notification when a Configuration has changed ConfigurationChangedEvent - sent by a ConfigurationProvider when its Configuration (or storage) has been modified. In my config syst

Re: [configuration] request for comments on refactoring

Brent Verner wrote: BTW, is there any reason that PropertiesConfiguration should not be made to be compliant with java.util.Properties files? I'm aware of the current duplicate-keys-create-lists behaviour, but IMO, it would be best to have the _same_ semantics as the java.util.Properties files.

[RESULT][VOTE] Emmanuel Bourg as Commons committer

Jakarta Commons has voted in favor of granting Emmanuel Bourg commit access. Email: Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Suggested userid: ebourg Projects to receive access: jakarta-commons, jakarta-commons-sandbox Vote results: -1: none 0: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1: Eric Pugh [EMAIL PRO

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29036] - [configuration] Load file configurations from the classpath

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[configuration] request for comments on refactoring

Hi all. I've been itching to use commons-configuration as the backend for my own config system, but I've found myself refactoring the heck out of commons-configuration along the way :-) So here goes what I'd think like to see commons-configuration look like at the end of it all. I'd apprecia

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-commons/commons-logging failed

Ceki Gülcü schrieb: But it looks like the change isnt really backward compatible, i have tried this now and got the following exception (patched commons-logging and log4j-1.2.8): java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.log4j.Logger.log(Ljava/lang/String;Lorg/apache/log4j/Level;Ljava/lang/Object

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/transaction/src/java/org/apache/commons/transaction/memory TransactionalMapWrapper.java

ozeigermann2004/05/18 00:40:29 Modified:transaction/src/java/org/apache/commons/transaction/memory TransactionalMapWrapper.java Log: Fixed weird suspend misconception Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +13 -15 jakarta-commons-sandbox/transaction/sr

RE: [vfs][Chainsaw]: Web start + external dependances + license=o uch

The idea of getting the user to drop in the 'other' jars into the lib/ext one I had thought of, but wasn't sure whether that is generally a good idea. I've got no idea. Maybe. I guess that's what the directory is there for, but I gather we would need to fully inform the user in the documentation

RE: [vfs][Chainsaw]: Web start + external dependances + license=ouch

[Resending for log4j-dev list my original bounced/non-subscribed] A quick but important correction... according to JSCH website: "JSch 0.0.* was released under the GNU LGPL license. Later, we have switched over to a BSD-style license." --http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/LICENSE.txt So it's BSD

RE: [vfs][Chainsaw]: Web start + external dependances + license=ouch

A quick but important correction... according to JSCH website: "JSch 0.0.* was released under the GNU LGPL license. Later, we have switched over to a BSD-style license." --http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/LICENSE.txt So it's BSD-style. LGPL and GPL are more ambiguous AIUI, which may or might not have

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/vfs build.xml

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't this a generated build file? For sure it is (was) a generated build file. I am not the one who generates them and i am still in the learning phase how to handle all the apache/maven techniques. I can say there is pretty much one have to know and to take into accou