DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33328] - Javascript error when validating a null hidden field

2005-03-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33328] - Javascript error when validating a null hidden field

2005-03-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22384] - datePattern not supported by JavaScript

2005-03-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Jelly] Memory leak revealed

2005-03-18 Thread Agustin Ramos
I've been struggling to find a memory leak in an enterprise app whose GUI we developed using jelly-swing. Finally I've been able to make a minimalistic test which demonstrates the leak. The problem is with the define:taglib and define:tag tags. The test shows how repeteadly invoking a tag define

svn commit: r158183 - jakarta/commons/sandbox/benchmark/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/benchmark/Test1.java

2005-03-18 Thread burton
Author: burton Date: Fri Mar 18 17:27:45 2005 New Revision: 158183 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158183 Log: Assert that the constructor benchmark isn't actually registered Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/benchmark/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/benchmark/Test1.java M

svn commit: r158178 - jakarta/commons/sandbox/benchmark/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/benchmark/xmlrpc/BenchmarkHandler.java

2005-03-18 Thread burton
Author: burton Date: Fri Mar 18 17:07:02 2005 New Revision: 158178 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158178 Log: Fixed a bug where getBenchmark would accidentally create a benchmark Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/benchmark/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/benchmark/xmlrpc/B

svn commit: r158174 - in jakarta/commons/sandbox/benchmark/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/benchmark/xmlrpc/BenchmarkHandler.java test/org/apache/commons/benchmark/Test1.java

2005-03-18 Thread burton
Author: burton Date: Fri Mar 18 16:53:10 2005 New Revision: 158174 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158174 Log: more unit tests... more javadoc... Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/benchmark/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/benchmark/xmlrpc/BenchmarkHandler.java jakarta/

[beanutils] attention beanutils committers!

2005-03-18 Thread Simon Kitching
Hi All, It would seem that the number of active beanutils committers has shrunk significantly. Firstly, is there anyone who can spare 10 minutes to review these two patches, and give a +1 (or not) to their inclusion in beanutils? I think both are appropriate, but as I'm not a regular beanutils c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33979] - MethodUtils.invoke for static methods

2005-03-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r158157 - jakarta/commons/sandbox/benchmark/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/benchmark/rrd/GraphTask.java

2005-03-18 Thread burton
Author: burton Date: Fri Mar 18 15:07:31 2005 New Revision: 158157 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158157 Log: Fixed a bug due to a threading issue corrupting a HashSet.. we now use a mutex... Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/benchmark/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/ben

Re: 'Apache Commons'

2005-03-18 Thread Simon Kitching
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 11:56 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: > Noticed that the latest onjava.com email refers to us as Apache Commons. > > Given that there is no longer a commons.apache.org to get in our way, > do we wish to brand ourselves as Apache Commons? > > There is no need to be a TLP to do t

svn commit: r158138 - in jakarta/commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_0: project.xml xdocs/changes.xml

2005-03-18 Thread epugh
Author: epugh Date: Fri Mar 18 12:56:28 2005 New Revision: 158138 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158138 Log: Prep for release Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_0/project.xml jakarta/commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_0/xdocs/changes.xml Modified: jakarta

svn commit: r158137 - jakarta/commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_0

2005-03-18 Thread epugh
Author: epugh Date: Fri Mar 18 12:48:07 2005 New Revision: 158137 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158137 Log: Release 1.0 based on voted 1.0 RC4 Added: jakarta/commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_0/ - copied from r158136, jakarta/commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_0_RC4/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32643] - [fileupload] FileUploadException, Stream ended unexpectedly

2005-03-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

'Apache Commons'

2005-03-18 Thread Henri Yandell
Noticed that the latest onjava.com email refers to us as Apache Commons. Given that there is no longer a commons.apache.org to get in our way, do we wish to brand ourselves as Apache Commons? There is no need to be a TLP to do this. Tomcat is now branded as Apache Tomcat and not Jakarta Tomcat,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34056] - Improve MultiPartEmail to ease extending

2005-03-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34056] - Improve MultiPartEmail to ease extending

2005-03-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[logging] Log4JLogger does not implement Log: wiki fix?

2005-03-18 Thread Simon Kitching
The commons logging wiki FAQ page (http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Logging/FrequentlyAskedQuestions) has this: == Log4JLogger does not implement Log == {{{ I have an exception with message 'Log4JLogger does not implement Log'! What's the cause and how can I fix this problem? }}} This al

log4j configuration in servlet-engine environment

2005-03-18 Thread Simon Kitching
Hi, I'm one of the committers for commons-logging and am looking into some memory-related issues when code is run in a servlet-engine environment. Imagine the following classloader structure (typical for a servlet engine): [bootstrap classloader] | [shared classloader] | [

[GUMP@brutus]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-03-18 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss