Re: [logging] JCL1 branch

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 21:46 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > I've cut a branch for any ongoing work needed for JCl1: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/JCL1/ > > future release candidates will be cut from this branch. I think that a JCL 2.x series would

svn commit: r379680 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/AvalonLogger.java

Author: skitching Date: Tue Feb 21 20:53:08 2006 New Revision: 379680 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379680&view=rev Log: Removed Serializable marker interface as it is not possible to implement this correctly in all cases. AvalonLogger was introduced in 1.0.4, and was marked Serializable.

Re: [logging] discovery and memory leaks

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 22:15 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > too much caffine for me yesterday (very bad for me resulting in mental > overdrive and then no sleep). even though i'm tired now, it the manic > phase may have produced a positive side effect - or possibly just > another mad idea...

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38746] - [pool] indicate that ObjectPools.addObject may throw an UnsupportedOperationException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38746] New: - [pool] indicate that ObjectPools.addObject may throw an UnsupportedOperationException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [logging] discovery and memory leaks

On 2/21/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the reason for indexing on classloaders is to allow configurations to be > saved on a per classloader basis. it strikes me that identity should be > as good as equality for this indexing. if so, then we could use > System.identityHashCo

[logging] discovery and memory leaks

too much caffine for me yesterday (very bad for me resulting in mental overdrive and then no sleep). even though i'm tired now, it the manic phase may have produced a positive side effect - or possibly just another mad idea... a lot of difficulties (including issues with hot deployment) arise from

Re: [logging] new simple logging component?

On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 09:22 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote: > Good Morning, > > Torsten Curdt wrote: > > ...and frankly speaking - it will also help marketing wise. JCL1 > > has a bit of a bad reputation. JCL2 could help to leave this behind. > > JCL 1.0x "has a bit of a bad reputation": Some develope

Re: [logging] Avalon log not Serializable?

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 17:59 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: > The Log4JLogger class appears to work correctly, because it implements > getLogger like this: > public Logger getLogger() { > if (logger == null) { > logger = Logger.getLogger(name); > } > return (th

Re: [logging] Avalon log not Serializable?

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 23:58 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: > Craig Mcc has also confirmed it looks broken to him. yep, broke > Here are the options I can see: > (a) remove AvalonLogger from the JCL 1.1 distribution. > (b) remove Serializable marker interface from AvalonLogger > (c) on deserialize,

[logging] JCL1 branch

I've cut a branch for any ongoing work needed for JCl1: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/JCL1/ future release candidates will be cut from this branch. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E

svn commit: r379595 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/JCL1/

Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Feb 21 13:41:05 2006 New Revision: 379595 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379595&view=rev Log: Created a branch for any ongoing JCL1 work. Future 1.x releases will be cut from this branch. Added: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/JCL1/ - copied fr

Re: [logging] interesting performance figures

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:51 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 00:42 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > On 2/21/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i've been running some performance tests: the aim being to check how > > > much slower JCL 1.1 runs that

Re: [logging] interesting performance figures

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 00:42 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: > On 2/21/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i've been running some performance tests: the aim being to check how > > much slower JCL 1.1 runs that the 1.0.x releases. the figures for log4j > > are interesting. the raw d

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38742] - [fileupload] Fails to apply fieldname

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38742] New: - Fails to apply fieldname

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "MavenPlugins" by DennisLundberg

This might very well be a misunderstanding on my part. Please feel free to correct it on the wiki. Dion Gillard wrote: I can't see how the jellydoc plugin is Maven 1 specific. if jelly is ever to move to m2 as a build, we'd need that plugin. On 2/21/06, Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [logging] JCL2.0 design - Architecture

Hi Boris, It is a bit early for us to put any real details around log4j 2.0. I think it is going to be some fundamental rethinking of the api, etc. So, to say that log4j 2.0 will provide a native implementation of o.a.c.l.Log, I am not sure. Maybe other committers have an opinion. I suspect th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38730] - [net] program hangs while trying to delete a file on a remote FTP Server after downloading same

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [logging] Avalon log not Serializable?

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 17:59 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: > Hi, > > I've been checking whether all the standard Log adapter classes are > Serializable. The Avalon logger declares itself to be Serializable, but > my reading of the code indicates this won't work. Can someone > confirm/deny this? I'v

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38686] - [VFS] Default VFS cache behavior

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [id] Composite identifiers

Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote on Monday, February 20, 2006 6:28 AM: > Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Jörg Schaible wrote on Monday, February 06, 2006 9:07 PM: >> [snip] >>> Looks fine. I've added the missing minLength/maxLength >>> implementations and made it serializable. I would add a >>> ConstantIdenti

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38686] - [VFS] Default VFS cache behavior

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38730] New: - program hangs while trying to delete a file on a remote FTP Server after downloading same

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu