Project: Commons Sandbox
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Compress
Affects Versions: Nightly Builds
Environment: Linux
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-b105)
Reporter: Christian Scheid
In the current snapshot of the ZipArchive class of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EL-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Leskowsky updated EL-9:
-
Attachment: implicitobjects.patch
I've updated the attribute key to refer to "org.apache.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462210
]
Christian Grobmeier commented on SANDBOX-183:
-
another thing: this newimplementation does depend on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462206
]
Christian Grobmeier commented on SANDBOX-183:
-
Adding it as altnerate would be possible. Archivers are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462198
]
Christian Grobmeier commented on SANDBOX-183:
-
Hi,
it seems difficult to integrate this in the existing
Hi,
on the http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/javaflow/
antTask.html page is a little mistake. It should be "dstdir" and not
"destdir" in order to work.
best regards
Chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hi,
seems like my first message didn't get through, so this is the 2nd try.
On the http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/javaflow/
antTask.html page is a little mistake. It should be "dstdir" and not
"destdir" in order to work.
best regards
Chris
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-247?page=all ]
Christian Poitras updated BEANUTILS-247:
Attachment: beanerror.zip
PropertyUtilsBean.java
The first attachment contains a Test which raises the exception given in
: 1.7.0 Release
Environment: I run BeanUtils on Windows XP with Eclipse 3.1.1.
Reporter: Christian Poitras
When an array with multiple dimension is used, accessing and setting properties
is not supported.
For instance, the call to PropertyUtils.getNestedProperty(myObject
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-176?page=comments#action_12437834
]
Christian Gosch commented on SANDBOX-176:
-
Some hints to make this hot (from the reporter, I have to admit):
Java bug 42444999 (ZipEntry() does not
Project: Commons Sandbox
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Compress
Environment: Any / All
Reporter: Christian Gosch
Currently it is not possible to generate externally readable ZIP archives with
java.util.zip.* or org.apache.commons.compress
Environment: IBM JDK 1.3.1 SR9 for IBM WebSphere Application Server
5.0.2
Reporter: Christian Gosch
Priority: Minor
Currently "commons compress" does not support JDK/JRE 1.3, but requires JDK/JRE
1.4 to compile and run. Since there are still productive envir
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-141?page=comments#action_12437592 ]
Christian Hufgard commented on NET-141:
---
Thanks for the quick response.
Ok, should have checked the archives before :). But I think if this is a
feature, it
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-141?page=all ]
Christian Hufgard updated NET-141:
--
Attachment: CustomSocketFactory.java
Simple factory that uses jdk1.4's feature to create a Socket with a connection
timeout.
> F
Versions: 1.4 Final
Reporter: Christian Hufgard
Hi,
If executing the following code
String hostname = "localhost";
FTPClient client = new FTPClient();
client.setDefaultTimeout(1000);
client.connect(hostname);
against a ftp server that ignores the connection attemp
anyone? please :-)
/Christian Andersson
Christian Andersson wrote:
> Hi there, I have a small problem that I'. hoping that you can help me solve.
>
> I want to be able to run tomcat on a server that we have available at a
> hosting firm.
>
> I can get tomcat up an
s beeing compiled as a 32bit executable
but java is a 64bit executable..
I've tried reading/changing more stuff to get it working, but sofar I
have been unable to do so.
so please to any of you withing the daemons project, I need help :-)
/Christian Andersson
-
it to see a release
because it forms a flexible i18n foundation.
Probably I should move it higher on my todo list ;-)
Christian
--
Christian Meder, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Way-Seeking Mind of a tenzo is actualized
by rolling up your sleeves.
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 01:59 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On 11/28/05, Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 21:43 +0100, Christian Meder wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 03:00 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > > On 11/28/05
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 21:43 +0100, Christian Meder wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 03:00 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On 11/28/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 11/27/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
ocale and key is reversed compared to Resources, it's
(locale, key); Resources is (key, locale)
* MessageFormat isn't cached as it is in Struts MessageResources
* setLocale isn't called on the used MessageFormat instances
* the TimeZone parameter isn't used like in the rest of
comm
know why it wasn't pushed in when
commons-resources was split out from Struts ?
Greetings,
Christian
> On 11/23/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've refreshed the Commons Resources site, sorted most the checkstyle issues
> > an
ections (no functors) and commons-collections-functor.
>
> Thoughts?
Any naming problems with the functor sandbox component ? It's rather
quiet since quite a while but at least it's not officially dead.
Greetings,
Christian
--
Christian Meder,
those needed to fully recreate a complex
object tree.
I'd be happy to commit this to the standard code base. Kind regards,
- Christian
--
Christian Aust
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 84500990 - Yahoo!: datenimperator - MSN: datenimperator
PGP: A94E 0181 664D 27E3 F05A A751 6A7E 90D1 A0A3
&msgNo=37987),
but I don't understand this... :o(
Thanks for help,
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Christian Essl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have start-levels
(OSGi like). This would also help to start timers etc.
--
Christian Essl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alizable.initializeService() throwing an exception, too?
I don't want to open pandora's box here, but I hit a similar issue
with that as well.
Ben
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:32:04 -0500
Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--
Christian Essl
---
some of your
thoughts.
Thanks,
Christian
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:08:48 -0500, Harish Krishnaswamy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me ask you this, how are contemplating handling these exceptions?
Are you going to be catching exceptions when ever you do a lookup or are
you planning on le
singleton-model. Any solutions? Maybe a two
step initilitation process - construct, save, init, return (takes some
flexibility from the ServiceImplementationFactories)? Or feeding the proxy
before returning it (more circular restrictive)?
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:26:12 +0100
Christian Essl <
ED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Christian Essl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ike a
bug. Or maybe you used an ServiceImplementationFactory directly - Spring
like? Or I just miss something.
Thanks,
Christian
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:34:28 -0500, Geoff Longman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wait a sec. Sure log errors when the modules are parsed. That makes
sense.
Bu
---
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Christian Essl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Christian Essl
-
Geoff
Geoffrey Longman
Intelligent Works Inc.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Christian Essl
-
To unsubsc
experience (generally,
anti-patterns in other software,
but still).
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://howardlewisship.com
-Original Message-
From: Christian Essl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08,
another try without a sessin-model actually quite simular to yours.
A ServiceFactory which is thread-local and delegates to another SerciceFact. the
servicefact checks if the implementation is already in the session if not creates it
and returns. it also keeps a list off all handed out implement
referenced from other modules).
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://howardlewisship.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Essl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:35 PM
romoted to first-class status (a
schema's id is qualified with
the module id and may be referenced from other modules).
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components http://howardlewisship.com
-Original Message-
From: C
In the documentation the parent method attribute for the conversion tag is
named 'parentMethod', while the DescriptorParsers uses 'parent-method'.
--
Christian Essl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
ubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
ish Krishnaswamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 1:45 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [HiveMind] Interceptors - CGLIB / Javassist comparison
Seems that's what you said before ;) But nevermind this is a
more-than-enough-pointer!
-Harish
Christian Essl wro
Sorry I made a mistake I meant ProxyFactory.extend() not create().
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:37:06 -0500, Harish Krishnaswamy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Absolutely! Thanks for the tips. So that's what I'll do.
-Harish
Christian Essl wrote:
Hi Harish,
I agree with you that
ve not come across any such limitations
with CGLIB.
From this intial study, it looks to me that we certainly need a way to
provide CGLIB interceptors to services. And that's what I'll be doing
this weekend. I know Christian has already done some work on this, I'll
see if I can reus
is hard to implement. I don't realy
get this schema code 8-).
Thanks,
Chris
--
Christian Essl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
constant. If this was not enough you could always assign an explicite
number.
Also for easier usage an interceptor-factory should (optional) give its
default order number. Ie the logging-interceptor is by default on 500 a
security interceptor on 1.
Thanks,
Christian
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 01
is: . Maybe the ServiceInterceptorFactories
could even provide a default-value.
--
Christian Essl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e to BaseProperties or XML/DOM4J or any other format
and storing the flattened configuration...
Bye
Christian
PS. Please cc me as I'm not on the list.
Christian Siefkes -
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Web: http:
.
I think this could also be used to define custom transformers, rules etc,
or even to build a Registry on top another Registry and than intercept
calls to the Registry, load modules from different locations etc.
--
Christian Essl http://jucas.sourceforge.net
on't plan on
demonstrating how to write a purely javassist-based interceptor, as I do
not
feel it is very intuitive. However, this simpler approach does seem to
be a
nice compromise and I would like to present it.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Essl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
HivemindLog took: 594
executing DynaProxyLog took: 4031
As I see interceptors for general use should be created using javaassist,
however other interceptors (which just add some custom AOP for some
components) could well be implemented using MethodInterceptors. Here the
higher
For the threaded model as I see interceptors are created for each core-
impl. Wouldn't it be enough that interceptors wrap the proxy. This would
certainly be more performant. Or maybe have interceptors under order lets
say 1000 wrap the core-impl (and be created each time) and others wrap the
p
3.) Event Publish/Subscribe Service (Harish does something there)
4.) adding RelaxNG tags to schemas
5.) user defined configuration processing (validation?)
6.) a service-model which allows unloading(replacing?) of implementations
--
Christian Essl http://jucas.sourceforge.net
nsidered interceptors?
Could you please share your findings?
I've not considered interceptors. Could you explain how you mean that.
Sounds like a good idea. If you mean something like dynamicly created
listeners etc (java.beans.EventHandler?), I would say a transformer or
custom rule could creat
t
and optional registration out of the services.
Propably there are other (better) solutions however it would be realy great
if someone could give me some solution to the mentioned problems.
Chris
-- Christian Essl
-
To unsubscribe,
ng parser. Just add a boolean onlyValidating and
call out to the rules only when the property is false.
--
Christian Essl http://jucas.sourceforge.net
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
Christian Essl http://jucas.sourceforge.net
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
code attributes.
You are right marker interfaces are not nice if you see JD 1.5 on the
horizont. The question is wheter we want to wait with this until we don't
need JD 1.4 compliance anymore.
--
Christian Essl http://jucas.sourceforge.net
---
. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
dea. Options are good.
Christian Essl wrote:
I am personally quite happy with the digester/translator aproach
HiveMind uses currently.
I like Knut's suggestion to split up the validating schema from the
processing.
Maybe in a later release of HiveMind it could be possible to use a
s
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
Ch
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
Christian Essl http://jucas.sourceforge.net
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I looked again at the EventListenerList and it is right that the
EventListenerList is concurrency save but not thread save. I also looked at
the JavaBeans-Specification and I saw that I was wrong, because it is left
open wheter a modification is regarded during event-delivery. (I still
think it
at 16:33:58 (+0200) Christian Essl writes:
...
Than I would give out the DOA directly as a service. Than as you also
said (for your second question) I would implement a ConnectionPool
service interface and a (or more) implementation(s) (one which just
holds one connection - for your testing). T
-0500, Bill Lear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday, October 3, 2003 at 16:45:42 (+0200) Christian Essl writes:
Sorry I wrote my answer send it and than just saw that Harish was faster
(and better). Maybe the only thing you should keep from my anser that
you should shutdown the registr
Sorry I wrote my answer send it and than just saw that Harish was faster
(and better). Maybe the only thing you should keep from my anser that you
should shutdown the registry (the pool may need it, because HiveMind now
supports a shut-down event).
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 10:12:37 -0400, Harish Kri
Your DAO is quite evolved, and I don't realy know Tapestry, but let me
still try to say how I would do it:
First I would directly expose the Registry in the Global and the
application gets the DAO directly from the Registry. The Registry should
not be build up too often it's just too time-consu
That would be realy helpful. Maybe we could add a tag which
would include the current BuilderFactory tags and set the properties after
the service is constructed.
(etc.)
(etc.)
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:22:52 -0400, Howard M. Lewis Ship
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
May
e user doesn't do any
configuration at that level?
And the service interface shouldn't really allow configuration changes
or?
And I am all for the pattern to ensure consistency in created objects ...
Not sure if it applies here though ...
Johan
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 15:05:16 +0200, Chris
nd probably want different instances)? If so, what is the need to have
a static instance? I suppose I can see a use for it to share data
between threads, but the singleton service should suffice?
Johan
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:52:58 +0200, Christian Essl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That
That's very good (and fast implemented). But do you realy have to do the
double-check on the class. I mean the user sees anyway what class it is
from the JavaDoc and HiveMind will always check that it fits the Service
interface.
Sure if the static field changes this ensures consistency, but on
That's certainly a good idea.
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:50:42 +0200, Knut Wannheden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering whether it would make sense to extend the BuildFactory
service (or maybe add a new wervice) to also be able to construct objects
by
returning the value of a classes st
karta.apache.org/tapestry
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
-Original Message-
From: Christian Essl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,
September 30, 2003 7:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HiveMind] Acess to schema - the second
There is
There is now a getSchema on the ConfigurationPoint, but I don't know how to
get the ConfigurationPoint from the module (Is there another way?). Sorry
if I didn't explain it or checked it a bit late:
My ConfiguratonBuilderFactory is a normal ServiceImplementationFactory
which does not have its o
The framework code uses this pattern to differentiate between the module-id
and the service/configuraton id.
Also for your own configurations it's realy confinient. Just check if a dot
is contained in the id and
you know that a contribution references something in the current module or
not.
On
te:
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
-Original Message-
From: Christian Essl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,
September 30, 2003 7:28 AM
To:
I'd like to suggest a new service-model, which allows to replace and/or
shut-down a service-implementation at runtime. (The latest refactoring
makes this much easier).
The model works basicly like the deferred-model (except that it always
returns the proxy). Initially it is in the deferred stat
o
allow for future 'start' events too or would it be too much to put it all
into one interface?
Regards,
Johan
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:46:14 +0200, Christian Essl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've written a Service which registers Destroyable Services (a special
interface wh
Because the introduction to HiveMind somewhere says that HiveMind is also a
sort of Singleton manager I'd like to suggest to document somewhere (may be
in the api-docs) that when a Service is gotten twice from the Registry - in
case of the deffered-service-type - the two returned instances are n
Is there any chance to get the Schema for a ConfigurationPoint from the
Registry? I would like to write a Factory which uses this Schema to parse
the content of its configuration.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
ork to redo all these services as POJO services
but looks like we (the industry) have already started moving in that
direction.
Christian Essl wrote:
(I have put your mails together)
Well there are some instruments involved but a lot of it is basically
workflow. I am currently envisioning Hi
with this
free glueing together.
-Harish
Christian Essl wrote:
That is a proof for the diversity of things HiveMind can be used for. Do
you think of using services as a sort of connector to different lab-
instruments. I also have to say that I do not realy understand a lot
(better nothing) of
Yes I agree with you. I also agree that HiveMind is easier to use than
EJBs. But I also have to say that until HiveMind supports transactions,
messaging, security, persistence etc. and that all in a possible clustered
enviroment there is still quite a way to go. So I do not currently (and for
t
de the service; the user
data is aside the point.
-Harish
Christian Essl wrote:
I think thats realy an intresting question. I mean I don't realy know
but I think - as you do - a Service provides a specific functionality.
However I am not sure wheter this must always be data-hiding - just
I think thats realy an intresting question. I mean I don't realy know but I
think - as you do - a Service provides a specific functionality. However I
am not sure wheter this must always be data-hiding - just look at a
database, which provides a good service. I also believe that one of the
firs
f BuilderFactory?
In case any of you missed it.
Christian Essl wrote:
> I am realy found of the idea of using the BuilderFactory.
>
> What I suggest is that you have like for configuration-points also the
> possibility to define a schema(-processing) for the most important >
'c
Hold off for a bit until I get a grasp of where you're headed.
Thank you for your answer and sorry that I did not realy make so clear what
it is good for. My suggestion may look big but is rather small.
I'm concerned about some lifecycle issues; especially maintaining good
support for contributi
Sorry if I fleed you with (useless?) ideas, but you know they just come up
when I look in the code and compare it to other apis (especially JBoss JMX)
.
As I see HiveMind is a cool combination of a very good configuration api
and a good but improveable service-manager, which allows to split up
Javassist doesn't do inner classes, so there's still going to be some
kind of _setService() kind of
method used by the proxy when it replaces itself.
Thank you that's right, and as you see I don't realy know Javassist.
I'm using "_" to indicate "infrastructure" methods, in the believe that
this
I think the Proxy created for a deferred Service is currently a bit slow,
because each call to a Service method first checks synchronized if the
service is there. While the Proxy is not anymore returned once the actual
Service is loaded I think most users of the Service will still go through
th
thread and you register directly the
CoreService the CoreService may be called out of the one thread and this
will break what I think most peaple use this service-type for namely no
need for synchronization.
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:12:36 +0200, Christian Essl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
S
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:56:08 -0400, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since you stated on the website that HiveMind is "agnostic" about how
interceptors are implemented, is there a way to use proxies rather than
javassist?
Yes you can use DynamicProxies. Just create a ServiceInterceptorFact
Howard suggested a Service which produces EventHanddlers. Following on that
I suggested a Central Event Service:
A Service where (all) Services can register themself with the event-type
(listener interface) and an event-id they are interested in and the
firing >Service just imforms the central
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 07:38:41 -0400, Howard M. Lewis Ship
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Harish's suggestion:
-->
-->
-->
-->
Last point was the excessive simularity of
and
point-id="...">.
Perhaps that should be to help
distinguish the two visually?
I think this is all right. So I wo
> What if you had two applications running under the
> same context though?
I guess they should have (as recommended by the
servlet-spec) have attribute names like
[package-name].HiveMindRegistry. (Of course if you
mean two
Tapestry apps you will have to find another way).
> And how will replicat
Yes, exactly.
Like:
public static Registry constructDefaultRegistry(){
ClassResolver resolver = new DefaultClassResolver();
RegistryBuilder builder = new RegistryBuilder();
builder.processModules(resolver);
Registry registry = builder.constructRegistry(Lo
I was now thinking about why I did not like getDefault(). I think the real
(Freud'schen) reason was that the first time I saw it I expected it to be something I
could get a default registry from. (You know I was eagar to try it out, had my head
full with the new stuff and didn't want to go throu
Yes, I would agree with this and generally would suggest to hold the registry in the
ServletContext. I think the ServletContext is thought for this. I actually use as
ContextListener which builds the Registry up when my web-app is started.
"Howard M. Lewis Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thi
Oh yes, of course, I like HiveMind and it helps me, I am happy to help
where I can.
Once we form up, we should be able to get everyone commit rights to > the
hivemind CVS repository.
Really? Without any patches/code? Unless they're already Jakarta (Apache?)
committers, commit rights won't be im
The reason I don't like this is because I guess it can lead to quite
some problems and it is not realy needed.
I'm thinking you are right ... its the balance of convienience vs.
correctness. Certainly, no
service implementation should ever use HiveMind.getDefault() ... the
BuilderFactory means
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
