Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.2
Environment: All
Reporter: Eric Bowman
Priority: Minor
This causes Ivy to fail (or at least I haven't yet figured out a workaround).
All the mirrors have it; if you look at for instance:
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mi
Hello,
How to get the Id value of a object after a insert sql order when the id
column is a auto-increment and primary key filed ?
Best regards
Eric HEBERT
ASTEK Grand Ouest
Architecte JavaEE5, certifié IBM WebSphere
Centre Alphasis
Espace Performance 3 Bat M6
35760 Saint Grégoire
Tel : +33
Oh, very cool. We're using your latest version now, works great when
using the DedicatedThread factory but it's running out of memory even
when using only threads=1 for the ThreadPool factory. Any ideas?
thanks,
eric
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:01:11AM -0700, Kris Nuttycombe wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-196?page=comments#action_12442199 ]
Eric Ferrer commented on DBCP-196:
--
[[ Old comment, sent by email on Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:53:19 -0700 ]]
Hope this makes it on JIRA, didnt see a way to post a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-196?page=comments#action_12427057 ]
Eric Ferrer commented on DBCP-196:
--
OJB is configured to use DBCP as its pool, the params passed are as follows
> Unexpected error with DBCP and
: Jboss 4.0
commons-dbcp-1.1.jar
commons-pool-1.1.jar
db-ojb-1.0.rc6.jar
Reporter: Eric Ferrer
Priority: Critical
Attachments: dbcp_exhausted_connection_error.txt
Our application has been running fine for 9 months and this is the first time I
have encounted this error
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-85?page=comments#action_12426106
]
Eric Bodden commented on COLLECTIONS-85:
Hello. This was indeed apparently due to a lack of synchronization. My
apologies for not noticing that
, but at this point it's not something I can change.
Sorry for the long email, and thanks in advance for any replies,
Eric Denman
BbWorld '06
New Client-Centered Program
San Diego, CA February 28-March 2, 2006
Register today! Visit: http://www.blackboard.com/company/events/bbworld/ to
One more thing...
I noticed that findbugs is commented out:
According to the homepage for Findbugs, while yes, it does require
JDK1.4 to run, it should analyze 1.3 code. When we compile for 1.3,
does that mean you are using a 1.3 JDK as well?
RC is looking good,
Eric
.
Also, since we are at RC stage, can I bump the versions of the maven-
tasks-plugin and maven-findbugs-plugin (should be 1.0!)
Eric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great everything works fine now!
Thanks for your help and patience, commons-VFS is really usefull.
Bye,
-eric
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi Eric!
FileSystemManager fsManager= VFS.getManager();
This code works the first time but not the second times after I have
deleted the
or should I rewrite a copyFrom to solve this trouble ?
Have a nice day,
-eric
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
With commons-vfs RC6, I experience sometimes the following exception :
Could not write to "file:///tmp/test/file3.txt" because it is read-only.
I've already answered it
seems that the object File pointing to file3.txt is maintained in
LocalFile between step 1 and 3 but unfortunatelly at step3, this file
pointer is no more valid.
I'm using Sun JDK 1.4.2_10 on Linux Fedora Core 4.
-eric
/*
* NewEmptyJUnitTest.java
* JUnit based test
*
* Created on De
seems that the object File pointing to file3.txt is maintained in
LocalFile between step 1 and 3 but unfortunatelly at step3, this file
pointer is no more valid.
I'm using Sun JDK 1.4.2_10 on Linux Fedora Core 4.
-eric
/*
* NewEmptyJUnitTest.java
* JUnit based test
*
* Created on De
tters.
Eric
On Dec 2, 2005, at 1:58 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion
for
commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
months.
1 year - and if possible take the user/dev mailinglist for this
out Apache Foundation and how you can become involved.
Eric
On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:44 PM, James Huang wrote:
Well, my use case is simpler but I know for sure it is happening in
real word: the encoding of email addresses is different from that
of the whole message. This happens to some Jap
There is no mention of the v1.0 release of Commons Email listed in the
"Latest Jakarta News" on http://jakarta.apache.org. It's not a big deal,
but it would be nice if it were added.
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
The Commons Email team of the Jakarta Project of the ASF is happy to
announce th
It looks like Commons Email 1.0 based on Henning's RC8 is go for launch!
The following people voted +1 for the release:
Dion Gillard +1
Stephen Colebourne +1
Henning Schmiedehausen +1
Eric Pugh +1
The following people voted +0 for the release:
robert burrel donkin +0
phil steitz +0
There
Get my +1 in the email record.
[X ] +1 Release Email 1.0 based on RC8
[ ] +0 General support but not definitive
[ ] -0 Unhappy about the release but not definitive (We want to
see RC9, RC10, and R11 first!)
[ ] -1 Do not release Email 1.0 based on RC8
Cheers,
Eric Pugh
On Sep 1, 2005
A very enthusiastic +1, it is about time!
On Sep 25, 2005, at 4:40 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
I would like to nominate Jörg Schaible as an Apache Jakarta Commons
Committer.
Jörg has provided patches to [configuration], [id] and [i18n] and has
contributed to discussion on commons-dev for over a
chance of a 1.0.1 coming out in a week!
[ ] +1 Release Email 1.0 based on RC8
[ ] +0 General support but not definitive
[ ] -0 Unhappy about the release but not definitive (We want to see
RC9, RC10, and R11 first!)
[ ] -1 Do not release Email 1.0 based on RC8
Cheers,
Eric Pugh
On Sep 1, 2005
--
8<-
[X ] +1 Release Email 1.0
[ ] +0 General support but not definitive
[ ] -0 Unhappy about the release but not definitive
[ ] -1 Do not release Email 1.0
Thanks!
Eric P
or 72 hours.
--8<-
[ ] +1 Release Email 1.0
[ ] +0 General support but not definitive
[ ] -0 Unhappy about the release but not definitive
[ ] -1 Do not release Email 1.0
Thanks!
E
Mac OS X 10.4 and I assume US locale. However, I have to downgrade
my dumbster to 1.5, so I could imagine weirdness. I am okay with
things as long as it works for you.
I'll call the vote now.
Eric Pugh
On Aug 31, 2005, at 4:46 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Eric Pugh &l
t failures.
It seems like attaching a "bad" url doesn't actually cause any
failures Can someone else confirm this issue?
Eric
On Aug 30, 2005, at 8:22 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
BodyPart primary = getPrimaryBodyPart();
if ((pr
Henning (and others),
Do you think we are at a good enough point to call for 1.0? I am
working on fixing the Gump metadata descriptor, which is currently
broken due to findbugs, but that shouldn't affect our 1.0.
Eric
On Aug 25, 2005, at 4:19 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
commons-xo was used in Turbine 3 and 2. For Turbine 2, we have
implemented something else, and Turbine 3 is dormant, so I think from
Turbine land I can give a +1.
Eric
On Aug 28, 2005, at 7:50 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Here's the list to archive in September, on September 3rd
e(){
return sentDate;
}
I am not sure about the toLowerCase().. The line you referenced
doesn't seem to deal with headers, but, if you want to make the
change, go ahead. and I'll be happy to post (and tag!) an RC7.
Cheers,
Eric
On Aug 25, 2005, at 6:38 AM, Henning P. Schmiedeh
Yes, think we expected to do a couple fixes to Turbine once we hit
1.0...
Eric
On Aug 25, 2005, at 6:41 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
.../target/src/org/apache/turbine/util/velocity/
VelocityHtmlEmail.java:191: send() in
org.apache.turbine.util.velocity.VelocityHtmlEmail cannot
I will call for one as soon as RC6 has been out for a couple days..
Dying for a vote and a release.. This horse has been beaten for long
enough!
On Aug 24, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Dion Gillard wrote:
Do you want to do an official vote?
On 8/25/05, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thing is that in the docs, the
links to the project reports didn't show up..
If no one finds a show stopper, then Henning has graciously
volunteered to be the release manager and perform the magic signing
of the jars with his Apache key.
-
Thanks.. I have updated the component.
On Aug 24, 2005, at 5:23 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 8/24/05, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While the [email] component is perfectly happy to host [exec] bugs in
CVS as we are just a couple letters off, it may be confusing to
people!
I've applied the one patch (35881) that was simple from Siegfried,
and the other one I don't feel comfortable b/c it involves changing a
signature (34056).
I am going to tackle the RC now.
Eric Pugh
On Aug 22, 2005, at 4:53 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-2
py to make the change.. I wasn't sure the
bugzilla-admin address was for these types of items...
Eric Pugh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Sounds good and useful.
Oliver
On 8/21/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about making a wiki page which lists every Commons component
(proper and sandbox) with a status. Something like my
http://www.generationjava.com/article/apache/StateOfTheSan
35881 can be applied, and if we get
back the info on 34056 on the // BROKEN bit, then it could go in as
well. Commons-email has taken this long, whats another week or two...
Eric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
, something like this in Jakarta Commons would be great, I
know I am using at least three different implementations of the same
basic functionality!
Eric Pugh
On Aug 1, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Kev Jackson wrote:
This is a very short description of the cleaned up Ant exec task
design:
* Exec: the
I've been casually following commons email on this list for the past few
months and it's been pretty low traffic. If I remember correctly,
someone mentioned that a release would be put out at the end of May, but
it never happened. I've submitted two trivial patches for email a few
weeks ago and
Most projects are very happy to have more interest! That is part of
the reason they are in sandbox, is to build up a group of interested
developers...!
On May 17, 2005, at 8:01 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
The convention in the sandbox (and in Commons Proper for that matter)
are to coordinat
Maybe this is a dumb question, but:
What are "@since directives"?
EKMacAdie
Brent Worden wrote:
I looked over things and before you proceed with a RC, I would like to make
a few changes to some doco. In particular:
1. Add @since directives to the new classes and methods.
2. Make some javado
feedback
and break the patch down into discrete parts, one for Checkstyle clean
up and one for this code change. That way, the commiters have the
freedom to decide if they want to break the API now or down the road.
Thanks for the food for thought,
Eric
Eric Spiegelberg wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
amorous and it's not going to set anyone's world on fire, but
I felt it would be nice to have a clean Checkstyle report for a v1.0
release. This is my first submission to Jakarta and I welcome any
feedback in order to make this patch accepted smoothly.
Thanks,
Eric Spiegelberg
Index: sr
The Scarab project has it's own logic that takes a Configuration
and makes it locale aware for i18n purposes for example.
Eric
On Apr 7, 2005, at 12:10 PM, James Mitchell wrote:
Like many of the Jakarta Commons projects, Commons Resources was
based, in part, from the initial work done in S
ocs symlinked to
/commons/configuration/1.0
/commons/configuration/1.1/ <-- new site docs
/commons/configuration/1.0/ <-- old site docs
And provide a link to the 1.1 and 1.0 from both projects....
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Heger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
ne anymore? I haven't
signed anything else with it, and haven't cross signed it at all, so
theorectically moving to a new keypair is fine, correct?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 6:51 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Develop
ple express interest, grab 'em! Ask for feedback, take their
concerns seriously, and pretty soon you'll be getting patches!
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Kevin A. Burton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:50 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subjec
ns in PGPMail's documentation about
ascii armouring, but no details on how to do it, just that it exists.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 9:01 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [email] promo
check the release before voting +1. i will not tally the votes before
2300 hours GMT on Tuesday 15th of March.
here's my +1
- Eric
-8<-
[ ] +1 Promote RC4 to commons-email-1.0
[ ] +0 In favour of this release
[ ] -0 Against this
Thanks for the tip.. This also solved my last issues with packaging
email. (I hope :-) ).
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 8:00 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [ANN][configuration]Release candidate
ally since
we have the required +1 votes, can I just add the file by hand? Icky, I
know, but...
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 3:49 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release commons email 1.0
f non redistributable jars?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 9:42 AM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release commons email 1.0
Do you use the ant plugin 1.8.1 for maven or the 1.9-SNA
"hand" tweaking is no longer required. Did
you get this error: "no protocol: ${javamail-1.3.2.url}"? I am going to
regenerate the Maven one and commit it.
I have tweaked the docs, I'll try and tackle the other little changes
today.
Eric Pugh
-Original Message-
Fr
"hand" tweaking is no longer required. Did
you get this error: "no protocol: ${javamail-1.3.2.url}"? I am going to
regenerate the Maven one and commit it.
I have tweaked the docs, I'll try and tackle the other little changes
today.
Eric Pugh
-Original Message-
Fr
I need the same logic.. Is it something you can share/ post to the
bugzilla?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:43 AM
To: Commons Developer
Subject: [lang] Addition for DataUtils
Hello... I just had to whip up a
The only open bug/enhancement is 32900:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32900.
It is quite clearly an enhancement that is post 1.0, and there is some
discussion on the bug list of whether it fits into the commons-email
charter.
Eric Pugh
-Original Message-
From: Dion
My +1 of course!
[X] +1 Lets release commons-email, it's been too long!
[ ] 0 Commons-what? Not ready for release
[ ] -1 Don't release. I can't get dumbster (replace with your reason)
to work.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
ady for release
[ ] -1 Don't release. I can't get dumbster (replace with your reason)
to work.
Eric Pugh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll take a loo at the latest as well, I need to update some
dependencies anyway for Turbine!
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Heger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:09 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE][configuration]Release 1.1
Strang
You didn't break fulcrum.. Fulcrum Configuration is built by Gump
against the CVS head, so the API change between 1.0 and 1.1 of
commons-configuration cause compile errors. The sooner we can get a
release out, the better.. I'll try next week to see if I can help!
Eric
-Origin
email/distributions/
The documentation is available here:
http://www.apache.org/~epugh/email/docs/
I'd like to get this to 1.0, as I've been sitting on the RC2 version for
over two months (no good excuse why :-( ).
Eric Pugh
-
ything
was very close at hand. Before I disapeared, we had reached the point
of cutting a release, and I got messed up in attempting to figure out
how to sign the release etc.
I've been perusing the email email lists ( :-) ) and it seems like we
are ready for a release.
What can I do
ration out. (that and gump has been complaining about Fulcrum
Configuration and the new API!).
Eric
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 2:16 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE][configuration]R
release or publish a timestamped
version that Fulcrum Configuration can depend on...
Eric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tion is to
pressure app vendors to upgrade faster (by using tools like Gump that
demonstrate the newer versions are solid against many packages) as well as
implement classloader isolation.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday,
Hi,
Can anyone (Dirk, etc.) offer advice on how to implement a
SoftReferenceKeyedObjectPool? That is, a pool combining the features of
SoftReferenceObjectPool and GenericKeyedObjectPool.
Thank you in advance,
Eric
p.s. - great work on [pool
tting it in the
jar file in the distribution, but no luck. Is there something obvious I am
missing?
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 5:47 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [
te release in 24 hours.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 4:51 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0
>
>
> -1
>
> Please
am willing to help
[ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
[ ] -0 I do not support this release
[ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons
---
Here is my +1.
Eric
Per my other email, can we use a better name? maybe something like
interpolateProperty? It doesn't have to be a JavaBean style getter since we
don't expect it to be called by external tools..
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 0
on) i.next();
config.clearProperty(key);
}
Things like this are cool.. But.. within the context of java, they just
seem more difficult to read.. Requiring the user to know what an
InvokerClosure is and does. It's neat.. I just haven't seen the use case
that requires it...
Eric
>
t
returned null, otherwise it called getPropertyDirect which ACTUALLY returned
the property.
Icky, I know, and getting rid of it has my earnest +1! Just the
similiarity of the names always seemed like a code smell to me.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd guess that the JSF jar's are not distributable on IBiblio, just like the
JavaMail ones?
ERic
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 7:00 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECT
ByteArrayDataSource needs a test or two.. Aside from that, maybe check over
the docs and the javadocs. I am thinking we do an RC on thursday, give it a
week, and roll next week?
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30,
Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [email] site cleanup
>
>
> You'll need to change the `email` directory as well
>
> drwxr-xr-x 8 epughjakarta 1024 Nov 25 04:21 email
>
> thnx again,
> Mark
>
> Eric Pugh wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
o final testing, cut a Release Candidate and then roll
1.0. We should also start thinking about what the next version will entail.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 5:25 PM
> To: Corey Scott
> Cc: Jakarta C
Mark,
I think I did the right chmod. Can you just double check?
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark R. Diggory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 5:08 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [e
quot;)>-1)
}
}
That way everything stays together. If we aren't actually asserting the
exception, then we shouldn't bother testing it..
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 3:19 PM
> To: Cor
we could think about maybe how we compile the jar? Our primary target
is definitly 1.3 for now though.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 4:04 PM
> To: Commons dev list; Corey Scott
> Subject: [email]
Hi guys,
I move the gump project file from jakarta-commons-sandbox.xml to
jakarta-commons.xml. You should be notified of a success/failure later
today.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Craig,
Joe Germuska (details below) was a sandbox committer for email:
Joe Germuska
germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Pugh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
thout automation
(or lots of attention to detail!).
Thanks for the assist..
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Corey Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 8:05 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [email] rm -
This looks better, more consistent!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark R. Diggory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 5:16 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [general] Updating the Commons common web site
>
>
> I ended up updating the site while
nstalled as packages) then it doesn't bother me.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:47 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
>
>
> Apologies for tr
Possibly.. I just followed the directions in the wiki. I also didn't
manage to import properly the /src/test tree and the /xdocs/ tree as well.
Not sure why.
The cvs-log should still be in the jakarta-commons-sandbox project, correct?
Eric
> -Original Message-
> Fro
email directory, or
leave the folder and a note pointing to the promotion? What about the
website as well? I think for [configuration] we just deleted both.
I'll update the wiki based on the feedback I get.
Eric
-
To
Yup.. the notice will go out later when I get the site up..
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 11:14 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/email - Imported sources
>
>
> Does th
Okay, the change was made. Can you possible remove the older dumbster.jar
file as an installed package?
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [email][
While I didn't use the approach that Mailreader-chain used, I found it very
*key* to selling me on Chain. So make sure the docs all point to the
example in struts-sandbox.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November
to leaving
sandbox. I'll take a look at trying to get dumbster to build in gump from
source. If you get motivated, email me what you think the gump script
should be.. lots of other SF.net hosted projects are built this way..
I won't get to it till tomarrow however..
Eric
>
romoted etc, to try and do some cleaning of house and fix the bugs? Maybe
have each committer take a couple of issues and try and get them to a closed
status. Either via "won't fix" or fixing them?
Maybe make next week "Bug Week" and someone (maybe me) could send ou
With the following votes the Commons community has decided to promote
Commons Email from the sandbox:
Commons Committers
+1 robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1 Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1 Shapira, Yoav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1 Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PRO
en. This allows us to use
a completely Maven generated Ant file for Email.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:13 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Email
Where are you looking.. I see them here:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/nightly/commons-email/?C=M;O=D
(linked from the commons homepage)
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:2
p put and get methods. I want them to use
my accessors ONLY.
At any rate, I've been using Chain for a couple days now in my project, and
am very happy to be replacing my own code with Chain!
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
currently tally:
+1 Eric Pugh
+1 Matthias Wessendorf
+1 Yoav Shapira
Robert, you raised the original lgpl issue which I hope is now sorted out.
While you didn't specifically put a -1 down, I think it was implied. Would
you be willing to change that to something else?
Eric
> ---
gt; > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This sounds like a job for regular expression
> > > substitution: "replace all
> > > uppercase chars with a space followed by that upper
> > > case char".
> > >
> > > See the ORO project:
> > >
uot;. Any ideas on how
to do this using commons-lang? If I had AnotherSpecialStep, I'd want to
split it up so I got "Another Special Step".
Would this be a good idea for commons-lang's WordUtils?
Eric
-
To unsub
It seems like byte[] would be simpler right? Save a layer of translation?
Of course, that might just move the translation inwards.. Please file a bug
so we don't forget about this...
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, Novemb
And LGPL ruins Eric's day.. Again.. When will Eric learn? He promises
that this is the last time he'll look at a library without verifying the
license first.
So, enough with the third person. I wouldn't be surprised in the author
picked LGPL because it look like a good mid
1 - 100 of 414 matches
Mail list logo
