Re: [jelly] Wishlist 1.0 (was RE: Release schedule for Jelly)

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Lanzetta
Pete, I've got some free time. I'm not a committer, but I'd certainly be willing to help. What areas should I concentrate on? -Mike Lanzetta - Original Message - From: "peter royal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 03

[lang] Validate patch

2004-02-01 Thread Michael Lanzetta
I've added an isInstanceOf method to the validate class, as well as appropriate tests in ValidateTest.  The patch is attached.  It was created using WinCVS 1.2, from the directory jakarta-commons/lang.  I've tested the new functionality from both Eclipse and the Ant build.   Please let me kn

[lang] Validate - instanceof test?

2004-01-18 Thread Michael Lanzetta
Hi all, Is there a reason Validate doesn't have an isInstanceOf method? I was thinking of adding one. -Mike Lanzetta P.S. I'm not a contributor, so does anyone have a pointer to the patch-submission process?

Michael Lanzetta is out of the office.

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Lanzetta
I will be out of the office starting 08/12/2003 and will not return until 08/20/2003. I am on vacation until the 20th. If it is urgent, please contact Greg Chatham, otherwise I will respond when I return. - To unsubscribe,

Re: [CLI] Version 2.0 - API

2003-03-05 Thread Michael Lanzetta
is stored as a value is returned I'm still working out with my company as to A) whether I'm allowed to use jakarta software, and B) whether I'm allowed to contribute But if both turn out true, and there's support for this idea, I'd be willing to take a pass at th

Re: [CLI] Version 2.0 - API

2003-03-04 Thread Michael Lanzetta
doing. With the builder, every modifier to an option is clearly stated, and the option is only created in its "fully-formed" state. Regards, Michael Lanzetta "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/04/2003 11:34 AM Please respond to "Jakarta Commons Developers

Re: [CLI] Version 2.0 - API

2003-03-04 Thread Michael Lanzetta
t I'm setting something, as opposed to getting the value. I think requiring that usage might make things a bit clearer, perhaps deprecating the old methodology. As for the mandatory vs. required battle, I have no preference - they both state what they do in clear language. Regards, Michae