Re: Logging packaging questions

2003-07-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
will be the death of log4j since no one will take the pain to put it manually in the classpath (as it would have, if the split had proceeded) Cheers, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Re: Logging packaging questions

2003-06-17 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mar 17/06/2003 à 08:25, Craig R. McClanahan a écrit : > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Date: 16 Jun 2003 20:50:45 +0200 > > From: Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >

Re: Logging packaging questions

2003-06-16 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
g to light lots of problems. But once they are fixed the system is more solid than before the sharing. All apps get their critical fixes *and* the fixes for all the problems not critical for them but critical for some other user of the same jar. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Descript

Logging packaging questions

2003-06-16 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
1.4.0 commons-logging-simple provides commons-logging-backend and so on, each package consisting of a single jar with no classpath in its manifest. I realise I've not been as terse as I wanted to so I'll stop now. Just ask if I wasn't clear enough. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot s