Re: [configuration] Roadmap

2007-04-19 Thread nicolas de loof
didn't you ? 2007/4/19, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Niclas, nicolas de loof wrote on Thursday, April 19, 2007 11:58 AM: > I'm using JDK 1.3 with M2 with no issue. > To be clear, I'm TARGETING java 1.3 runtime, but my M2 runs over > jrockit5. I'm using th

Re: [configuration] Roadmap

2007-04-19 Thread nicolas de loof
his would require not only the rt.jar but a fully installed JRE. If you're interested in such a build process I can give help. 2007/4/19, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: nicolas de loof a écrit : > I agrea with Jörg : having some classes depend on java 1.4 should not make &g

Re: [configuration] Roadmap

2007-04-19 Thread nicolas de loof
I'm using JDK 1.3 with M2 with no issue. To be clear, I'm TARGETING java 1.3 runtime, but my M2 runs over jrockit5. I'm using the compiler bootclasspath to point to SUN java 1.3 rt.jar to ensure compatibility. 2007/4/19, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: nicolas de l

Re: [configuration] Roadmap

2007-04-19 Thread nicolas de loof
I agrea with Jörg : having some classes depend on java 1.4 should not make all the lib depend on java 1.4 when possible. This can be handled in maven2 with some compiler configuration (two executions with includes/excludes), just by having some naming convention (or deticated package) for java 1.4

Re: REPOST [attributes 2.2] Missing optional package Extension

2007-04-06 Thread nicolas de loof
p/too snowy (hurts cable for some reason). Hen On 1/16/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone make a release to solve this ? > > 2007/1/5, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > The manifest.mf in SVN contain a "Created-B

Re: budget

2007-04-03 Thread nicolas de loof
Sorry, wrong recipient ... :'-( Nico. Le 03/04/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : 2007/4/3, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Peux tu compter ça dans ton budget : > http://www.camif.fr/wwwSurf/pages/multimedia/OffreDuJour.asp?REFERENCE=883272 &

budget

2007-04-03 Thread nicolas de loof
Peux tu compter ça dans ton budget : http://www.camif.fr/wwwSurf/pages/multimedia/OffreDuJour.asp?REFERENCE=883272 Ca serait pas mal au fond du placard de l'entrée ?

Re: Commons-Attributes 2.2 Corrupted Manifest

2007-03-06 Thread nicolas de loof
t. 2007/3/6, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 3/6/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I already asked for a 2.2.1 release to remove those "-Extension" in > manifest, as they break running my app under tomcat 4. > > Those libs are only required by t

Re: Commons-Attributes 2.2 Corrupted Manifest

2007-03-06 Thread nicolas de loof
I already asked for a 2.2.1 release to remove those "-Extension" in manifest, as they break running my app under tomcat 4. Those libs are only required by the compiler jar, not the api (runtime) jar, tho they can be removed from the manifest. This manifest is hand-writen and is included during th

Re: m2 groupIds

2007-02-14 Thread nicolas de loof
That would'nt work anyway If you allready downloaded commons-cc:1.1 and get (maybe transitiviely) a dependency on org.apache.commons:cc:1.2, you will get both in your classpath as maven will not kwon those tow groupIds are for the same artifact. We can't expect maven to reload the 1.1 POM that i

Re: m2 groupIds

2007-02-13 Thread nicolas de loof
According to this, when relocation projectX for new release N+1 option 1 : making dependency to oldGroupId:N+1 will work, but making dependency to newGroupId:N+1 will introduce duplicate jars issues if other dependencies introduce transitive-dependency to oldGroupId:N option 2 : relocating all P

Re: m2 groupIds

2007-02-13 Thread nicolas de loof
ll, so users get involved by having to explicitly change the groupId On 2/13/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't understand the distinction you make between scenario 1 and 3 : > > if new release use a relocation pom under commons-xxx and DOESN'T deploy

Re: m2 groupIds

2007-02-13 Thread nicolas de loof
I don't understand the distinction you make between scenario 1 and 3 : if new release use a relocation pom under commons-xxx and DOESN'T deploy a jar under this group - maven2 users will get relocated artifact + a warning to update dependencies - maven1 users will not get the new version, may ask

Re: m2 groupIds

2007-02-13 Thread nicolas de loof
You need to create a relocation POM for the release that does relocation to avoid hundred users to ask for upload on ibilio. The relocation POM will produce a warning on console for maven users. You can expect users to consider warnings and update groupId. The relocation POM will not be required

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.4 based on RC1

2007-02-12 Thread nicolas de loof
I've attached a doc path for howto-filbased.xml that describes ManagedReloadingStrategy and give a spring-JMX sample. 2007/2/11, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: OK, I'll look at user guide to add some doc and attach it to Jira. 2007/2/10, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[jira] Updated: (CONFIGURATION-237) Contrib : managed reloading strategy

2007-02-12 Thread nicolas de loof (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] nicolas de loof updated CONFIGURATION-237: -- Attachment: howto-filebased.patch documentation patch > Cont

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.4 based on RC1

2007-02-11 Thread nicolas de loof
OK, I'll look at user guide to add some doc and attach it to Jira. 2007/2/10, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: nicolas de loof wrote: > could CONFIGURATION-237 be considered for this release ? Well, we can add these classes to the release, but I would prefer to have some more

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.4 based on RC1

2007-02-09 Thread nicolas de loof
could CONFIGURATION-237 be considered for this release ? 2007/2/9, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 1.4 is missing from the downloads page. Couple of checkstyle errors (no idea if they matter). Minor nitpick on the Runtime Dependencies page - 'couple' means 2, not 7 :) Clirr in the xml for

Re: REPOST [attributes 2.2] Missing optional package Extension

2007-01-16 Thread nicolas de loof
Can anyone make a release to solve this ? 2007/1/5, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The manifest.mf in SVN contain a "Created-By: Apache Maven" but I never got maven include such "Extension-List" in my manifest. The one generated by the maven build don&#x

Re: REPOST [attributes 2.2] Missing optional package Extension

2007-01-05 Thread nicolas de loof
="1.4" for the Javac task. I've trie building with source="1.3" target="1.3" and it passed Nico. 2007/1/4, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 1/4/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to SVN log, the manifest has been ad

Re: REPOST [attributes 2.2] Missing optional package Extension

2007-01-04 Thread nicolas de loof
d suggest a new release as compatibility with 1.3 is blocking for me to upgrade. Nico. 2007/1/4, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 1/3/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using commons-attributes with Spring on a Java 1.4 application. >

REPOST [attributes 2.2] Missing optional package Extension

2007-01-03 Thread nicolas de loof
Hello, I'm using commons-attributes with Spring on a Java 1.4 application. I've included commons-attributes-api 2.2 (from maven repo) I get this Tomcat exception on startup : LifecycleException: Missing optional package Extension[ant, implementationURL= http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/ant/jars/ant

[jira] Commented: (CONFIGURATION-237) Contrib : managed reloading strategy

2006-12-07 Thread nicolas de loof (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-237?page=comments#action_12456318 ] nicolas de loof commented on CONFIGURATION-237: --- My commons-configuration is build inside Spring context

Re: [dbutils] Preparing the 1.1 release

2006-11-15 Thread Nicolas DE LOOF
leases out :) Hen On 11/14/06, Nicolas DE LOOF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, I didn't read the beginning of this thread. Do you want to create an Ant build only to ensure compilation for Java 1.3 runtime ? I'm doing the same with maven by setting the compiler plugin to use

Re: [dbutils] Preparing the 1.1 release

2006-11-14 Thread Nicolas DE LOOF
Sorry, I didn't read the beginning of this thread. Do you want to create an Ant build only to ensure compilation for Java 1.3 runtime ? I'm doing the same with maven by setting the compiler plugin to use JRE 1.3 rt.jar as bootclasspath. I've made some tests to ensure this produces java 1.3 co

Re: [discovery] 0.4 release

2006-11-14 Thread Nicolas DE LOOF
4) Build under 1.3 using ant, and the site using maven. Could you please tell me why maven can't be used for building project for java 1.3 target runtime ? Nico. Henri Yandell a écrit : So... things for a 0.4 release: 1) Add apology+info to release notes/sites concerning 0.3. 2) Fix source

[jira] Updated: (CONFIGURATION-237) Contrib : managed reloading strategy

2006-11-14 Thread nicolas de loof (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-237?page=all ] nicolas de loof updated CONFIGURATION-237: -- Attachment: ManagedReloadingStrategyTest.java A simple testcase. Some code may be shared with TestFileChangedReloadingStrategy

[jira] Commented: (CONFIGURATION-237) Contrib : managed reloading strategy

2006-11-14 Thread nicolas de loof (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-237?page=comments#action_12449598 ] nicolas de loof commented on CONFIGURATION-237: --- JMX has multiple way to expose application datas/features. This pacth only includes a

[configuration] Contrib : CONFIGURATION-237

2006-11-07 Thread Nicolas DE LOOF
I've created CONFIGURATION-237 for contributing. The patch adds a ManagedRealoadingStrategy taht is designed to be exposed as JMX bean to reload configuration from a JMX console. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capg

[jira] Updated: (CONFIGURATION-237) Contrib : managed reloading strategy

2006-11-07 Thread nicolas de loof (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-237?page=all ] nicolas de loof updated CONFIGURATION-237: -- Attachment: CONFIGURATION-237.patch > Contrib : managed reloading strat

[jira] Created: (CONFIGURATION-237) Contrib : managed reloading strategy

2006-11-07 Thread nicolas de loof (JIRA)
: Nightly Builds Reporter: nicolas de loof Priority: Minor Attachments: CONFIGURATION-237.patch This patch adds a reloading strategy based on management request, typically from a JMX console. The Strategy implements a MBean interface so can be exported as a JMX Managed

[dbpc] SQLNestedException cause exception not logged

2006-10-13 Thread Nicolas DE LOOF
Hello, I got an issue using Commons-dbcp due to misconfiguration. The stacktrace doesn't contain the cause exception. As I'm running under Java5, the "THROWABLE_CAUSE_METHOD" evaluates to true, so the printStackTrace is not completed by SQLNestedException. But as no one called the setCause m

Re: [logging] pom for commons-logging-api and building/testing JCLwith Maven 1

2006-08-18 Thread Nicolas De Loof
I didn't read the start of this topic, but just my 2 cents about creating more sub-projects for implementation specifics : You're suggesting to split the project into modules for log4j, avalon and so on. Using maven2 you can create those artifacts as POM (not jars) and keep commons-logging as

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Attributes 2.2

2006-07-31 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Just as a (late) suggestion : would you consider migration to org.apache.commons groupId ? (http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-relocation.html) Nico. Henri Yandell a écrit : 4 +1s (including my own...quick +1 for the record). Leo Sutic Dennis Lundberg Stephen Colebourne Henri Yandel

Re: [VOTE] Release Attributes 2.2

2006-07-24 Thread Nicolas De Loof
+1 from a nightly build user. Henri Yandell a écrit : This is a vote for releasing Commons Attribetus 2.2 based on RC2. RC2 is here: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-attributes --- [ ] +1 I support this release [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... -

Re: [all] maven2 pom.xml files of commons

2006-07-12 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Commons does not have pom.xml for its components. Them pom files you find at the repositories (i.e. ibiblio) are converted by a piece of software from our (Maven 1) project.xml files. This conversion is made automatically. We are able to add some comments in our project.xml files to fix some

[dbcp] "nojdbc3" build not available using maven build

2006-07-12 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Hello, I'm using commons-dbcp on a Java1.3 environment and so I'm required to recompile it with source modification to comment JDBC3 code. ant build has a jdbc3 detection task, but maven build has no equivalent. Maybe a element can be used to add this, but AKAIF it uses the presence of a cla

Re: [all] change group id? [WAS Re: [logging] RC on ibiblio ?]

2006-06-08 Thread Nicolas De Loof
k Cool, I'll have a go at it, to see it I can get it right. It'll have to wait until this weekend though. -- Dennis Lundberg Carlos Sanchez wrote: > You are right. This would involve copying all the old group sutff to > the new group and add the relocation poms. > > On

Re: [all] change group id? [WAS Re: [logging] RC on ibiblio ?]

2006-06-07 Thread Nicolas De Loof
AFAIK there is a way in maven repo to "relocate" dependencies, so that a POM for any commons can be published at commons-xxx groupId, that "relocates" to org.apache.commons" groupId. Servletapi for example is now under "javax.servlet" http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/servletapi/servletapi/2.4/se

Re: [Vote][Release][Attributes] Release Commons-Attributes 2.2

2006-05-30 Thread Nicolas De Loof
+1 from a 2.2-nightly-build user. Leo Sutic a écrit : Hi all, well, as usual I'm about one year late getting a release out, but I'd like to release Commons Attributes 2.2. The big changes are: 1. Some bugfixes 2. Support for attribute packages when using maven. +1 from me. /LS --

Re: [csv] j2se1.3 compatibility / header line writer

2006-05-22 Thread Nicolas De Loof
will run under Java 1.3 without noSuchMethodException AND uses Java1.4 Stringbuffer optimizations sebb a écrit : On 22/05/06, Nicolas De Loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It is supported in jdk1.3.. Just cast the stringbuffer passed in to >> an object, so like >&g

Re: [csv] j2se1.3 compatibility / header line writer

2006-05-22 Thread Nicolas De Loof
It is supported in jdk1.3.. Just cast the stringbuffer passed in to an object, so like StringBuffer.append((Object) StringBuffer)). Much more efficient than an if... Surely a StringBuffer is already an Object? Or am I missing something here? StringBuffer has a new method in Java 1.4 to a

Re: [attributes] please add support for attributepackages in maven plugin

2006-05-17 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Where can I find a nightly build of the maven commons-attribute plugin ? The commons-attributes nightly-build only contains compiler + api Nicolas De Loof a écrit : Sorry, I've just discovered this feature is in CVS... http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/attributes/changelog.html Nicol

Re: [attributes] please add support for attributepackages in maven plugin

2006-05-17 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Sorry, I've just discovered this feature is in CVS... http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/attributes/changelog.html Nicolas De Loof a écrit : attributepackages property is used on ant task to allow short attributes in code. There is no support for it in the maven plugin. A simple propert

[attributes] please add support for attributepackages in maven plugin

2006-05-17 Thread Nicolas De Loof
attributepackages property is used on ant task to allow short attributes in code. There is no support for it in the maven plugin. A simple property may do the job. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It i

Re: [logging] RC on ibiblio ?

2006-04-05 Thread Nicolas De Loof
I agree about NOT making non-final jars available on ibiblio (httpclient beeing an exception) So could the next RC be uploaded to http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/ ? Please also consider using the new groupId recommandation for apache commons-X : org.apache.commons.X Martin

[logging] RC on ibiblio ?

2006-04-05 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Hello, Can someone upload commons-logging RC on Maven2 ibiblio repository ? It would be very cool to also upload a POM and the sources jar... Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the

Re: [pool] Announcing Release Candidate 2 for Pool 1.3

2006-03-24 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Just a cosmetic bug : AFAIK maven groupId for new version of jakarta commons should be "org.apache.commons" : http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html Nico. Oliver Heger a écrit : I tested RC2 with Commons Configuration and did not find any problems (but this is n

Re: [configuration] please use in POM

2006-03-23 Thread Nicolas De Loof
I agree with this : only "required for any use case" dependencies have to be made non-optional. Without this, transitive dependencies is not a cool feature anymore and becomes a "-hell". Well, anything but core dependencies are IMHO optional. If you decide to make usage of functionality, that

[configuration] please use in POM

2006-03-22 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Hello, I'm using maven2 and commons-configuration, and I need to configure lot's of as commons-configuration POM declares lot's of dependencies that are only required for some specialized use-cases. Those dependencies may be declared as (dom4j, servletapi, comons-codec...) Could someone

Re: [all] Maven2/RMIC?

2006-03-13 Thread Nicolas De Loof
I think you have to declare mojo snapshot repository in your pom.xml : http://mojo.codehaus.org/using-sandbox-plugins.html I myself don't yet use maven2 (just looking at it), so I can't help you. James Carman a écrit : Thanks, Jörg. I tried using it, but my M2 installation couldn't download t

[validator] bug in EmailValidator ?

2006-01-25 Thread Nicolas De Loof
EmailValidator.getInstance().isValid("test@ " + '\t' + "foo.com") returns "true". I don't think use of blanks between @ and domain is valid for eMails. Perhaps SPECIAL_CHARS needs to include blanks ? Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and i

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2

2005-12-01 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Can the project.xml be "customized" using jelly ? something like this : jdbc It would be neater if something could be done in the maven.xml to detect JDK 1.3 and add it into the class path from a property specified in the build.properties. I'm going to face the same issue in C

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2

2005-12-01 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Can't this dependency be solved using jdbc2.0-stdext.jar ? I'm using Jdk 1.3 and cannot upgrade. Not supporting 1.3 anymore will stop my migration to commons-configuration. Nico. Yes, with jdbc2.0-stdext.jar commons-configuration can be compiled and run under a JDK 1.3. Unfortunately t

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2

2005-12-01 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Mario Ivankovits a écrit : robert burrell donkin wrote: There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far. Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-( 3 the release has been compiled using 1.4.2: if commons-configuration is supposed to support 1.3 jdks then

[dbcp] please upload a non JDBC3 (JDK 1.2/1.3) jar to apache repository

2005-05-30 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Hello, I'm using commons-dbcp in my project running on a JDK 1.3. It requires me to use the commons-dbcp library compiled with 'nojdbc3' option. I'm also using maven to resolve dependencies. Commons-dbcp jar is available from apache repository (sync with ibiblio), but this is the JDK1.4/jdbc3 v

[dbcp] please upload a non JDBC3 (JDK 1.2/1.3) jar to apache repository

2005-05-30 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Hello, I'm using commons-dbcp in my project running on a JDK 1.3. It requires me to use the commons-dbcp library compiled with 'nojdbc3' option. I'm also using maven to resolve dependencies. Commons-dbcp jar is available from apache repository (sync with ibiblio), but this is the JDK1.4/jdbc3