[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12514495
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on POOL-97:
---
This fix breaks binary compatibility but only at package private
askdefs.StreamPumper.run(StreamPumper.java,
> >> > Compiled Code)
> >> > [junit] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
> >> > [junit] java.lang.IllegalMonitorStateException: current thread not
> >> > owner
> >> > [junit] at
> >> > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.StreamPumper.run(StreamPumper.java,
> >> > Compiled Code)
> >> > [junit] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > And then it just hangs! This is done using ant 1.6.5. When I tried with
> >> > ant 1.5.4 it didn't work at all because we use "propertyset":
> >> >
> >> > BUILD FAILED
> >> > file:G:/apache/jakarta/commons-logging/build-testing.xml:171:
> >> Unexpected
> >> > element "propertyset"
> >> >
> >> > I don't know the jvm requirements for the different ant versions.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'll be checking in the ant script shortly... Any pointers to what
> >> might
> >> > be going wrong here is greatly appreciated.
the good news is that my old machine is now working again :-)
here's my bad news:
JCL source will not compile for me on a 1.2.2 JVM (IIRC some 1.2 JVM had
compilers bugs)
the tests will not compile for me on 1.3.1 JVM: MockSecurityManager uses
Exception.getStackTrace() which was introduced with 1.4
runs well for me on 1.4
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
> > >
> > > Is anybody working on JCL 1.1.1?
> >
> > Not afaik. I put some effort in a bit back, but the release process
> > was too confusing for the time I want
atleast once a day.
one of my JAMES TODOs is to create a collaborative email moderation
application with web interface but since i haven't even finished fixing
the IMAP implementation yet, it seems a long way off...
- robert
--
any objections to me jumping in, applying some patches, fixing some bugs
and generally tidying compress up?
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BETWIXT-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464026
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on BETWIXT-57:
--
I was a little concerned about the effects on existing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BETWIXT-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin resolved BETWIXT-57.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix committed.
> Class loader problem in JBoss vers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BETWIXT-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462843
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on BETWIXT-57:
--
There are issues with switching universally to using
reshmeat [3].
>
> [1] http://my.netscape.com/
> [2] http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd
> [3] http://download.freshmeat.net/backend/rss-0.91.dtd
the licensing for 0.91 is interesting (to say the least) which is why we can't
distribute it
remov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Jakarta Commons community is pleased to announce that Apache Jakarta
Commons Betwixt 0.8 is now available for download from
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_commons-betwixt.cgi.
Please remember to verify the release when downloadi
by my count:
+1 robert burrell donkin
+1 Jörg Schaible
+1 Niall Pemberton
+0 Rahul Akolkar
+1 Mario Ivankovits
so the vote passes with 4 binding +1's
thanks to everyone who found the time to take a look
(and yes, i will make very sure i don't mess my signatures up this time)
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:12 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 12/11/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Robert!
> > > release candidate 4 is available @
> > > http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/ and the site @
> > > http://
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-101?page=comments#action_12456131
]
Robert Michel commented on IO-101:
--
Henri,
I came across this bug just yesterday and saw your patch today. Separately, I
had come up with an alternate fix which
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 17:10 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On 11/26/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:05 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > On 11/25/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:05 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On 11/25/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > is there anyway to get the maven folks to take a look at the project.xml
> > before it's released rather than afterwards?
>
> You mig
i've cut an RC3 including niall's improvements. it's available from
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt. please review.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 09:48 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 11/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 19:53 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > &g
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BETWIXT-56?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed BETWIXT-56.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed. Many thanks.
BTW i'm happy for apache folks to add their names to the betwixt and hack away
> Build impr
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 19:53 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> thanks to everyone who commented on RC1
>
> i've now cut an RC2 based on the feedback and uploaded the artifacts
> (only) to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/. please
> check them.
>
>
to a VOTE.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 12:37 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/12/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > everyone ok with the current codebase?
> >
> Sorry for the late response.
better late than never
definitely appreciated :-)
> I am not fami
everyone ok with the current codebase?
- robert
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 13:14 +0100, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> Thanx for beating me to it :) (very swamped atm).. I ran the tests and had a
> look at the rc and it
> looks good :)
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> Thomas Dudzi
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 15:19 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt
> >
> > - robert
>
> I ran a linkcheck on the Maven generated site and it found a couple of
> broken links that I h
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gers.
sound ok?
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 22:50 -0700, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
> On 10/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > barring unforeseen events, i should have time on tuesday and wednesday.
> > the infrastructure should all be back up by then.
>
> great,
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 01:19 +0200, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> Highly appreciated Robert..
barring unforeseen events, i should have time on tuesday and wednesday.
the infrastructure should all be back up by then.
- rob
these things done, if someone could e.g. mark the issues
> necessary for 0.8 in JIRA ?
i'll try to find some time in the next day or two
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-36?page=comments#action_12439310
]
Robert Enyedi commented on VFS-36:
--
Thanks, Mario!
> [vfs] J2EE JAR format files support
> ---
>
>
Hello list,
In my opinion it would be good if SynchronizedCollection checked in its
protected Constructor which takes a collection and a lock, if the lock
were actually null (as advertised in the javadoc).
I have added a unidiff (Against collections-3.2) to address this issue
Robert
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BETWIXT-54?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed BETWIXT-54.
Resolution: Fixed
hi holgar
thanks for the patch
i've committed a variation upon the patch. i'm a little concerned that logging
t
CursorableLinkedList.
Robert Ribnitz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3.2 release build.
hope this helps
Robert Ribnitz
---
./commons-collections-3.2-src-orig/src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/map/UnmodifiableMap.java
2006-05-14 22:39:42.0 +0200
+++
./commons-collections-3.2-src/src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/map/UnmodifiableMap.java
in the idea?
i've had a little bit of think and i'd be interested in sign up if you'd
be happy for me to sign on...
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e point too. It only has
> certain components currently (ones that have been cleaned up).
>
> - the 'In the Sandbox' category is an idea for a stock interview about
> a new sandbox component. A bit of advert
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BETWIXT-53?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed BETWIXT-53.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed. Many thanks.
Robert
> Patch: MethodExpression - improved error logg
release.
but overall it's just about good enough
>
> [X] +1 looks good enough
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 nope, something needs fixing
>
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
g from the list of project members ;-)
some checkstyle issues: bad path?
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i count:
+1's (binding)
robert burrell donkin
Stephen Colebourne
Yoav Shapira
Davanum Srinivas
with no other votes. if i have made any mistakes please post a correct.
therefore the vote for jakarta karma for jochen has passed.
- robert
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 23:31 +0100, r
- branches
|
- tags
|
- candidates
|
- releases
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-105?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin resolved LOGGING-105:
---
Resolution: Duplicate
JCL does not fit nicely into the Maven2 dependency management scheme so this
creating a good POM difficult
s there any reason why we actually need to remove dead tags?
subversion holds the history of the project and deleting history seems a
little extreme (as well as bring potentially problems down the line).
why not just move dead tags to a special area?
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BETWIXT-52?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed BETWIXT-52:
> Bug/Testcase: Reading does not work: Container holding a list (generics) of
> interface implement
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BETWIXT-52?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin resolved BETWIXT-52:
--
Resolution: Fixed
This took quite a lot of work for what turned out to be a small fix!
Thanks very much for unit tests - I don
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BETWIXT-50?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed BETWIXT-50:
Resolution: Fixed
Committed. Many thanks.
Wrong issues number in commit message :-/
Maybe I'll learn one day...
> Versionin
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BETWIXT-50?page=comments#action_12413183 ]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on BETWIXT-50:
--
Committed. Many thanks.
> Versioning of XML Output
>
>
> Key
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:58 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 5/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Jochen Wiedmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is a pmc'er over in web services
> > land. Jochen would like commons karma
> > (http://mai
team but i
think we can use his help. since this is a vote for karma, i think this
can be executed a little quicker than normal. i'll tally votes not
earlier than 2230 hours GMT on Thursday 25th of May.
here's
probably be
a good idea to add an indication on the navigation bar that these
documents apply to the latest code...
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rk on it.
>
> This is one of many steps that I feel are needed to get a faster, more
> reliable and more automated system for handling our component sites.
> That would in turn free the developers, who might not be interested in
> the site stuff
just to let everyone know that we need to change the site url from
cvs.apache.org to people.apache.org. i plan to go through the
project.xml's in trunks-proper and make this change but thought it best
to let everyone know first.
- r
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 11:02 +1000, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > Opening this up again.
> >
> > groupId: org.apache.commons
>
> +1!!
ditto
- robet
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 20:32 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:11 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > or should we try to create a POM for commons-logging-api or perhaps both?
> >
> > not sure
> >
> > the API works best as a virtua
ging API, or
Torsten's null implementation.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 12:32 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/14/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:21 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:#
> >
> >
> >
> > > I feel that we should be using ACL's on
> > &g
han is necessary for this purpose.
probably carlos is right that all the dependencies need to be marked as
optional but the full JCL jar shipped.
not sure...
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m the usual repositories with groupId:
commons-logging and artifactId: commons-logging.
Please
remember to verify the signatures.
Robert Burrell Donkin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
check a
release candidate before casting a vote...
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be run that could
verify signatures.
be a good thing to move to henk's system of key management as well.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 11:10 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 20:18 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> >> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > minotaur is now back up but i deleted the files yesterday. they are now
> >
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 20:18 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > i've uploaded JCL1.1FC to
> > http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/. it's not yet
> > available through the distributions and it will be a day or two before
&
ng the new groupId recommandation for apache
> commons-X : org.apache.commons.X
should we make this change for the whole of the commons?
how much hassle would this change be for downstream consumers?
- robert
-
To unsubs
t; > http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-collections/site/
> >
> > Release notes here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-collections/site/release_3_2.html
> >
>
> I have prepared an RC2 at the above URLs. This fixes all points raised
>
n't an oversight, i'd like a full cut
of the maven generated website to be made available on line.
the JDK version for the MANIFEST.MF 'Created-By' property is
1.3.1_16-b06. the components claims 1.2 compatibility. i'd prefer either
a 1.2 JDK to be used or
se) on www.apache.org. Can you folks
> > take a look at it and let me know what you think?
> A little late on this but anyways...
> Just to meantion that the framework of my open-source project at sourceforge
> is also looking at commons-proxy. I would apre
e
(ideally by dropping the jar in as a replacement for a RC or 1.0.4) and
report back promptly if i have made any mistakes whilst cutting the
distribution.
thanks for everyone's hard work in getting this release out :)
- robert
-
i count the votes as follows -
binding votes:
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 Henri Yandell
+1 Simon Kitching
+1 Torsten Curdt
+1 Rahul Akolkar
non-binding votes:
+1 Dennis Lundberg
+1 Jörg Schaible
please check this tally and post corrections for any mistakes. if there
are no
ommons-dev/ and
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-user/ and
continues to the present.
the pre-history of jakarta-commons (the events leading up the formation
of the commons) is to be found on
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-gen
RC11 contains fixes to a few speilings and improvements to the
documentation (thanks dennis).
RC11 is available from:
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging.
I will tally votes no earlier than 2400 hours GMT Sunday 7th May.
here's my +1
- robert
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 23:02 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > please check the trunk preferably by building and checking the
> > distribution. i plan to cut the release candidate sometime around 2200
> > hrs UTC. i will call a vote as soon as th
please check the trunk preferably by building and checking the
distribution. i plan to cut the release candidate sometime around 2200
hrs UTC. i will call a vote as soon as the candidate is posted.
- robet
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
> +
> > +
>
> An empty ul followed by end li???
> Perhaps you meant
>
>
it's generated using a style sheet: good for ensuring all the contents
are accurate but the xml isn't as pretty as it might be. (hence the
empty list when there are no subsections.) i didn't think it did much
harm but i'll tidy it up by hand.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 22:32 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 22:27 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> To save people reading through below, my summary is:
> >>
> >>
>
FWIW geronimo has a clean room implementation of the 1.3 specification.
they have a lot of spec implementations: it's a pity they aren't more
widely available.
- robert
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 18:08 -0700, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> I had put them in ibiblio, will be available soon
&
ther no changes above the minimum version
changes are acceptable or cosmetic and documentation ones are.
it feels like a long, long we've travelled. after all this effort, i
think one final push is worth it. given the fact that the changes are
cosmetic and documentation, i think i'll cut on
thanks :)
- robert
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 21:39 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: dennisl
> Date: Mon May 1 14:39:36 2006
> New Revision: 398696
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398696&view=rev
> Log:
> Correct spelling.
>
> Modified:
>
ase, then are there going to be enough to supervise the
codebase?
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it, please do. a copy of your public key (but not
your private) should also be in your home directory saved as .pgpkey.
see http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html for more details on
signing releases.
hope to be able to provide some more feedback at the weekend
- robert
--
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 10:26 -0400, James Carman wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin suggested that I make it a proposal rather than a
> vote.
sorry - my advice didn't prove too good, i'm afraid :-/
i've been busy and your proposal got buried in loads of general commons
emails.
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 11:59 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 4/27/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:06 +0100, sebb wrote:
> > > On 27/04/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2006-0
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:06 +0100, sebb wrote:
> On 27/04/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 21:34 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > after some investigation, the issue which turned up with RC8 was
> > > determined not t
earlier than 2300GMT Wednesday 3rd Mat 2006
here's my +1
- robert
-- 8<
-
[ ] +1 Release Candidate 10 As JCL 1.1
[ ] +0 Positive but have not had time to check release
[ ] -0 Negative
[ ] -
Jakarta Commons Logging 1.1 Release Candidate 10 is now available.
Distributions can be downloaded from:
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging
jars are also available from the http://cvs.apache.org/repository/
repository.
Please download, check and test this candidate.
Robert
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 21:09 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> As you can see I've had a go at fixing the odd diagnostic message. I'd
> be grateful if you could double-check this sometime.
>
>
> The initial code did:
> // match
undle claims Tomcat to be 4.1.130 and because of the bundle
> mechanism I will had to copy the commons-logging-1.0.4.jar
> over the contained commons-logging-api.jar.
>
> But remember, this is a pathologic case triggered by some interacting plugins
> with probably invalid extens
.
+1
probably needs to go in the release notes too
> I'm also planning to fix the minor diagnostic message issue in the next
> hour or so.
>
> And we should probably double-check behaviour of 1.1 adapter classes
> when loaded by an old JCL version.
+1
it doesn't lo
that jakarta is very well indexed by google, users
looking for an scxml implementation will find commons-statechart. users
browsing or looking for a general state management tool may not.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rovement in this area. This isn't important enough to hold back
> release by itself, but if we're doing more work I might tweak this
> output too.
i plan to post something to the list cancelling the vote so please go
ahead. if you could update the troubleshooting document with any traces
that have change that'd be great.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
an issue has been reported by simon with this release candidate. i think
it best to abandon this VOTE. i'll post another release candidate once
this issue has been resolved.
- robert
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 21:38 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Commons Logging 1.1 has been in develop
good lightweight
state machine library than the fact that it can be loaded from a SCXML
document. stephen's point about the naming is related: the component
should be a lightweight state engine first and foremost. so
commons-state would be
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 17:01 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello:
>
> What about generating the web site? In particular, I'd like to see the
> release notes that detail the changes from the previous versions.
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-loggin
perhaps talking about a lightweight engine.
> This VOTE will remain open for a minimum of 72 hours.
seems very short: best to allow at least a week. i also prefer noting a
time.
- robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/. Note that the
candidate contains the Jdk14Logger in the API jar to allow backwards
compatibility for tomcat 5.
Please check carefully before casting your vote.
Here
t; > The price paid is just mild offense to purists, who *are* correct that
> > this class doesn't really belong in a jar labelled "api".
> >
> > Right now, I'm rather tired of JCL (and I'm sure Robert feels worse).
> > Anything that gets this out t
release will be proposed for election early
next week.
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
x27;ve got the feedback i wanted now (off list) so i think the time is
right to cut another release candidate and hold a release vote next
week. i'll probably give the vote two weeks this time.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt a month or
> so ago. I cannot vouch for it's legitimacy though.
http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html
looks fine to me
- robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
use of the author tag was thought to increase the chance of a court
ruling that when the source was created, the contributor intended to
work for themselves rather than on the ASF's behalf. not sure how strong
this argument would be but (since it was only a recommendation) quite
possibly no
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 04:04 -0400, Sandy McArthur wrote:
> FWIW: this commit put the trunk of pool over 90% test coverage
> according to clover
excellent :)
- robet
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 16:21 -0400, Sandy McArthur wrote:
> Vote passes.
>
> +1
> Sandy McArthur
> Robert Burrell Donkin
> Phil Steitz (changed from -0)
> Stephen Colebourne
>
> no other votes.
>
> I'll tag it, build it, and push it out once I figure ou
1 - 100 of 2004 matches
Mail list logo