DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36261] - [jci] no class could be loaded after a compilation error occured

2005-10-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36261] - [jci] no class could be loaded after a compilation error occured

2005-10-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Bug 36261] - [jci] no class could be loaded after a compilation error occured

2005-08-23 Thread Joerg Heinicke
> Any suggestion how to handle that otherwise? Continueing this topic in the other thread 'Handling compilation errors': http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11245564832&r=1&w=4 Joerg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Bug 36261] - [jci] no class could be loaded after a compilation error occured

2005-08-22 Thread Torsten Curdt
Off-list you talked about possibly introducing a lifecycle to the CompilationProblemHandler. IMO their purpose is to different to get a common lifecycle. Many purposes do not even need a lifecycle at all (e.g. logging the compilation problems, or (as in my adapter to XSP) delegating the prob

Re: [Bug 36261] - [jci] no class could be loaded after a compilation error occured

2005-08-19 Thread Joerg Heinicke
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36261 > > > > wait a sec ...let's discuss that on the list first. > > while I agree that it makes sense to remove > > the counting from the problem handler interface > > I am not too sure I like the other changes too much. Off-list you talked

Re: [Bug 36261] - [jci] no class could be loaded after a compilation error occured

2005-08-18 Thread Joerg Heinicke
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36261 > > wait a sec ...let's discuss that on the list first. > while I agree that it makes sense to remove > the counting from the problem handler interface > I am not too sure I like the other changes too much. > > We could also make use of a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36261] - [jci] no class could be loaded after a compilation error occured

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36261] - [jci] no class could be loaded after a compilation error occured

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36261] - [jci] no class could be loaded after a compilation error occured

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu