TECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 8:22 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Configuration] Defaults and CompositeConfiguration
> Refactoring
>
>
> Don't know if somebody else has suggested this before, but
> wouldn't it
> be quite e
Don't know if somebody else has suggested this before, but wouldn't it
be quite easy to implement this default configuration feature in a
generic way as a decorator?
Oliver
Emmanuel Bourg schrieb:
Does this change address the complexity of the default configuration use
case with a composite co
Does this change address the complexity of the default configuration use
case with a composite configuration ?
Emmanuel
Eric Pugh wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to update you on some major surgery I performed on the
Configuration package. This amounted to two aspects:
1) Remove "Defaults" from BaseC
Hi all,
I wanted to update you on some major surgery I performed on the
Configuration package. This amounted to two aspects:
1) Remove "Defaults" from BaseConfiguration and friends.
Previously you could declare a PropertiesConfiguration etc and pass in a
default configuration value to read from
