[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/11/2003 01:52:48 PM:
[snip]
(Maven has some hidden acknowledgments in it's plug-in docs) says you
I saw them back in September at the very bottom of page the PMD plugin
docs:
http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugin
Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/11/2003 01:52:48 PM:
[snip]
> (Maven has some hidden acknowledgments in it's plug-in docs) says you
Huh,
what are these hidden acknowldegments?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Pub Key:http://bl
> Did I have the right to do [develop HiveMind on WebCT's time]?
> At the time, I was 100% certain I did ...
No one is suggesting that you didn't act in good faith, Howard. What is
making a mountain out of a molehill is your apparent unwillingness to
involve the proper channels in the process. A
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Robert Leland wrote:
> You've acknowledged that when you commit any code to Apache you give up
> ownership of that code.
That's not quite right. When you commit any code to Apache (under the
Contributors License Agreement), you grant the ASF a non-exclusive right
to that code
/hivemind/
> http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:25 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: RE: Company Acknowledgements [wa
Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
So, what would you propose? Strip HiveMind out of the sandbox CVS? Track down any backup mirrors and
erase them? Kidnap its users and brain wash them?
You've acknowledged that when you commit any code to Apache you give up
ownership of that code.
Also what is said
I am certainly no legal expert, but if the code that resides in CVS
complies with ASF requirements, how is it legally exposed?
-Harish
Bill Lear wrote:
On Tuesday, November 4, 2003 at 20:44:23 (-0500) Howard M. Lewis Ship writes:
...
So, what would you propose? Strip HiveMind out of the sand
On Tuesday, November 4, 2003 at 20:44:23 (-0500) Howard M. Lewis Ship writes:
>...
>So, what would you propose? Strip HiveMind out of the sandbox CVS?
>Track down any backup mirrors and erase them? Kidnap its users and
>brain wash them?
Indeed --- this is absurd. We are all "legally exposed" eve
ns/sandbox/hivemind/
http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:25 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: Company Acknowledgements [was :Re: [HiveMind] 1.0 Beta]
&
apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
> http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:19 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: RE: Company
javatapestry.blogspot.com
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:19 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: Company Acknowledgements [was :Re: [HiveMind] 1.0 Beta]
>
>
>
> --- [EMAIL PROT
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There was an even earlier post, to Jakarta General, concerning this
> question of IP. I maintain, due to the volume of code and concepts that
> were copied out of (or adapted out of) Tapestry that WebCT would not win
> any kind of legal challenge to the ownership of
Howard,
> There was an even earlier post, to Jakarta General, concerning this
question
> of IP. I maintain, due to the volume of code and concepts that were
copied
> out of (or adapted out of) Tapestry that WebCT would not win any kind of
> legal challenge to the ownership of the IP ... but it wo
There was an even earlier post, to Jakarta General, concerning this question of IP. I
maintain, due to the volume of code and concepts that were copied out of (or adapted
out of) Tapestry that WebCT would not win any kind of legal challenge to the ownership
of the IP ... but it would be murky,
> I've been trading drafts of the proposal and I think they are
> on the right track. I suspect we'll be going forward soon --
> possibly today.
I can't find in the archives where you've made the Jakarta PMC or the ASF
Board aware of this specific incident. When IP ownership issues arise on a
pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once it goes beta, I'll start monitoring the user list as well as the developer list.
Unless beta coincides with promotion to top level, in which case there will be a hivemind-user and hivemind-dev lists.
WebCT will be getting back to me soon to finalize the wording for
The worst thing I expect to happen is to rename the base package from
org.apache.commons.hivemind to org.apache.hivemind. If you can deal with that, I
would go ahead. Viva HiveMind!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web
Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
> Should we hol
Should we hold of on using it?
I will wait a few days.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WebCT will be getting back to me soon to finalize the wording for promotion (I developed HiveMind partially on their time, so they have a say -- they want to ensure they get proper credit).
--
Victor Cekvenich,
Str
Once it goes beta, I'll start monitoring the user list as well as the developer list.
Unless beta coincides with promotion to top level, in which case there will be a
hivemind-user and hivemind-dev lists.
WebCT will be getting back to me soon to finalize the wording for promotion (I
developed H
FYI, I will be converting basicPortal.com to use HiveMind. Soon move it
to the commons user list?
.V
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe we'll be getting to beta soon. Also, a proposal to promote HiveMind up to Jakarta top level will be coming soon.
The alpha-3 version, available for download (s
I believe we'll be getting to beta soon. Also, a proposal to promote HiveMind up to
Jakarta top level will be coming soon.
The alpha-3 version, available for download (see the home page) is very close to what
the beta will be.
There is some discussion about what features the beta will have that
I would like to
participate in the 1.0 Beta as we have a complex system that is built in
Tapestry 2.2 and HiveMind looks like it could definitely be of use within
the new framework that we want to implement in regards to services and Work
flow, etc.
Adam GreeneDirector of Software Developmen
22 matches
Mail list logo
