On 13/06/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/13/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * tar.gz files match zips for structure.
What does that mean?
> In Opera I got broken images on this page.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site/changes-report.html
Y
On 13/06/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/12/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't find the GPG key you used to sign the tarballs -- it's not in
> http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/io/KEYS and there isn't a KEYS
> file in the svn. Looks good otherwise.
On 6/12/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/13/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * tar.gz files match zips for structure.
What does that mean?
Means I ran verify_archive_equivalence.sh :)
> I'm -0 on the validator bit meaning a reroll. I dislike how Maven1
> pu
elease commons-io 1.3.2)
We still do not have the required three votes by PMC members for a release. See
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html
for details.
Jochen
--
"Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resulting in
a p
On 6/13/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* tar.gz files match zips for structure.
What does that mean?
In Opera I got broken images on this page.
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site/changes-report.html
You are right, this is
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MS
On 6/6/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have created a new distribution and a new site which you find at
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist
* PGP matches (once I found your key in the FileUpload KEYS file)
* MD5 fails - as someone else mentioned, the .md5
On 6/13/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are still unanswered questions on the original thread (from memory):
- KEYS used to sign the release
- Site title
I've already replied to these in separate votes.
- Deprecation of FileCleaner
My opinion here is different from Stephe
On 6/12/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't find the GPG key you used to sign the tarballs -- it's not in
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/io/KEYS and there isn't a KEYS
file in the svn. Looks good otherwise.
+0 as is, with +1 once the key is updated and I can verify t
On 6/13/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The deployed site below still says Validator as the title. Is this fixed?
I see that Niall has already fixed this. We do not need a separate
vote to include this fix, do we?
--
"Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resul
embers for a
release. See
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html
for details.
Jochen
--
"Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resulting in
a preventative effect against manipulating elections.
The german government justifying
to 1.3.2 without any issues.
Thank you,
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:27 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Still no votes! (WAS: [VOTE] 3rd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2)
&
The deployed site below still says Validator as the title. Is this fixed?
On 6/7/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have created a new distribution and a new site which you find at
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/comm
elopers List
> Subject: Still no votes! (WAS: [VOTE] 3rd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2)
>
> We still do not have the required three votes by PMC members for a release.
> See
>
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-
> t3880798.h
I can't find the GPG key you used to sign the tarballs -- it's not in
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/io/KEYS and there isn't a KEYS
file in the svn. Looks good otherwise.
+0 as is, with +1 once the key is updated and I can verify the sigs.
On 6/6/07, Jochen Wiedmann < [EMAIL PROTECTE
+1
Niall
On 6/6/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have created a new distribution and a new site which you find at
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site
This version matches revision 544971, which I intend
Will dig into things today and get a vote out.
On 6/12/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We still do not have the required three votes by PMC members for a release. See
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html
for details.
We still do not have the required three votes by PMC members for a release. See
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html
for details.
Jochen
--
"Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resulting in
a preventative effect ag
While checking the distros I noticed the following minor things:
- The source distro does not unpack in a directory with the "-src"
suffix. This is standard for other commons components.
- The md5 files do not contain the file name. (Maybe this is a maven
standard. However the commons release i
How to handle this? We have only three votes:
[+1] Sebb, Jochen
[-0] Stephen
but we need at least three positive votes from PMC members?
Jochen
--
"Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resulting in
a preventative effect against manipulating elections.
The german governm
On 6/7/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are the jar archives necessary?
Yes.
Other projects tend only to release zip and tar.gz.
The jar files are released implicitly, via the Maven repositories. The
only difference is that I do this explicitly.
Jochen
--
Women have the ability to
On 06/06/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have created a new distribution and a new site which you find at
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist
Are the jar archives necessary?
Other projects tend only to release zip and tar.gz.
If they are not needed, it wo
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Please cast your vote.
[ ] +1
[ ] =0
[ ] -1
Hmmm, I feel I'd like to vote -1, but that does seem a little unfair as
I obviously haven't been following that closely. Officially, my vote is
a -0.
I hadn't tracked the changes going into [io], but I was surprised to
find
Hi,
I have created a new distribution and a new site which you find at
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site
This version matches revision 544971, which I intend to tag as
commons-io-1.3.2 in case of a successful vote. Compared t
23 matches
Mail list logo
