+1, I'd support this release.
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 19:44, Gary Gregory wrote:
> As previously discussed on commons-dev, we believe Commons Codec 1.2 is
> ready for release.
>
> The source for this release candidate has been tagged as CODEC_1_2_RC1 and
> is available for download here:
> http://c
+1
Gary Gregory wrote:
As previously discussed on commons-dev, we believe Commons Codec 1.2 is
ready for release.
The source for this release candidate has been tagged as CODEC_1_2_RC1 and
is available for download here:
http://cvs.apache.org/~ggregory/codec-1.2-rc1/
For more information on Common
> [x] +1 I support this release
> [ ] +0 If you say so
> [ ] -0 I don't think it's a good idea, but I won't stand in your way.
> [ ] -1 I'm opposed
Oleg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
[ ] +1 I support this release
[X] +0 If you say so
[ ] -0 I don't think it's a good idea, but I won't stand in your way.
[ ] -1 I'm opposed
-John K
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI
+1
On Nov 13, 2003, at 8:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
As previously discussed on commons-dev, we believe Commons Codec 1.2 is
ready for release.
The source for this release candidate has been tagged as CODEC_1_2_RC1
and
is available for download here:
http://cvs.apache.org/~ggregory/codec-1.2-rc1/
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Ballot:
>
> [X] +1 I support this release
> [ ] +0 If you say so
> [ ] -0 I don't think it's a good idea, but I won't stand in your way.
> [ ] -1 I'm opposed
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
As previously discussed on commons-dev, we believe Commons Codec 1.2 is
ready for release.
The source for this release candidate has been tagged as CODEC_1_2_RC1 and
is available for download here:
http://cvs.apache.org/~ggregory/codec-1.2-rc1/
For more information on Commons Codec, see
http://ja
