From: "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> i've taken a quick look and you've made quite a few changes. any pointers
> you'd like to give me about these changes?
I wanted to ensure that the API allowed a choice between the four options I
could find:
Match on specified class only vs Mat
>static {
>if (System.getProperty("org.apache.commons.lang.Debug") != null) {
> debugLogging = true;
>}
>}
>
>If it's useful for us, it might be useful for other developers.
Careful, this would throw a SecurityException when used in an unsigned
applet or webstart app. It also has the disadvantag
On Thursday 31 October 2002 05:29 pm, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 09:42 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
>
>
> > Robert, as you have probably spotted, I have created a number of new
> > classes
> > and a new API for the reflect subpackage in [lang]. FieldUtils is
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 09:42 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Robert, as you have probably spotted, I have created a number of new
classes
and a new API for the reflect subpackage in [lang]. FieldUtils is about
finished, but MethodUtils is modtly commented out.
So, there is still much w
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:24:22PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> PROPOSAL
>
>
> there are versions of the MethodUtils code in two components - beanutils
> and lang.
>
> i'd prefer not to have to maintain two versions of this code. it makes no
> sense to have bugs fixed in beanu
On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 01:11 AM, Steve Downey wrote:
On Sunday 27 October 2002 02:58 pm, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 07:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i also think that the String Taglib should consider
On Sunday 27 October 2002 02:58 pm, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 07:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
>
>
> >> since this change will mean quite a bit of work and will introduce a new
> >> dependency for beanutils,
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 09:42 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Robert, as you have probably spotted, I have created a number of new
classes
and a new API for the reflect subpackage in [lang]. FieldUtils is about
finished, but MethodUtils is modtly commented out.
oops. didn't spot that. t
From: "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> make beanutils dependent on lang
>
+1
> deprecate MethodUtils
> -
> the version of MethodUtils in beanutils would be deprecated. a new
> implementation of the methods in MethodUtils would deleg
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 07:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:
since this change will mean quite a bit of work and will introduce a new
dependency for beanutils, i'd rather not rely on lazy consensus.
obviously
i'm +1.
Ideas for how to hand
PROPOSAL
there are versions of the MethodUtils code in two components - beanutils
and lang.
i'd prefer not to have to maintain two versions of this code. it makes no
sense to have bugs fixed in beanutils but not in lang or vice versa. there
are also performance improvements and API en
11 matches
Mail list logo