Quoting Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I agree it could be read that way, with the word "simple" implying that. But
> then the same author (Craig McClanahan) also wrote the standard
> BasicDynaBean implementation - it has a single HashMap storing all values -
> simple, indexed and mapped.
nt if the other methods would
be added.
Guillaume.
-Message d'origine-
De : Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 13 février 2004 11:54
À : Jakarta Commons Developers List
Objet : Re: [beanutils] Indexed/Mapped DynaProperty
I agree it could be read that way, w
A "mapped property" should be just that - a map containing properties
and therefore those properties should have String names.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: [beanutils
ame, Object key) ?
Anyway, thanks for your replies,
Guillaume.
-Message d'origine-
De : Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 13 février 2004 02:21
À : Jakarta Commons Developers List
Objet : Re: [beanutils] Indexed/Mapped DynaProperty
Shouldn't it be though - if
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jakarta Commons Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: [beanutils] Indexed/Mapped DynaProperty
> hmmm
>
> bit of a tough one this. i think
hmmm
bit of a tough one this. i think that it'd involve an addition to the
DynaBean's API. this is question probably belongs on the dev list so
i'd suggest that we take it there. (if you're unwilling to process - by
filtering - the torrent of mail that is commons-dev then you might like
to
