Dmitri Plotnikov wrote:
--- Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dmitri Plotnikov wrote:
Here's another iteration of Clazz APIs.
Without looking at the API itself, I like what you are describing
here. It seems intuitive. Now, my question is this. If I have
a ClazzLibrary or a ClazzLo
Steve Downey wrote:
On Monday 28 October 2002 02:28 pm, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Dmitri Plotnikov wrote:
Here's another iteration of Clazz APIs.
Without looking at the API itself, I like what you are describing
here. It seems intuitive. Now, my question is this. If I have
a ClazzLibrary or a
On Monday 28 October 2002 02:28 pm, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Dmitri Plotnikov wrote:
> > Here's another iteration of Clazz APIs.
>
> Without looking at the API itself, I like what you are describing
> here. It seems intuitive. Now, my question is this. If I have
> a ClazzLibrary or a ClazzLoader,
--- Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dmitri Plotnikov wrote:
> > Here's another iteration of Clazz APIs.
>
> Without looking at the API itself, I like what you are describing
> here. It seems intuitive. Now, my question is this. If I have
> a ClazzLibrary or a ClazzLoader, can I per
Here's another iteration of Clazz APIs.
The basic changes:
1. I did away with the modelURI and all that nonsense. You should be
able to uniquely bind an object to its clazz. I don't think any more
that the idea that the same object can belong to multiple clazzes is
workable.
2. There is now a no
