On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 11:16, Janek Bogucki wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with the [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag. Changing the constructor
> access modifier from protected to public allowed the [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag to
> work.
>
> -Janek
>
>
This diff gets it working without having to modify DefaultMa
"A name in the Java Language, namely the name of a package, class,
interface, field, constructor or method. A name can be fully-qualified, such
as java.lang.String.equals(java.lang.Object), or partially-qualified, such
as equals(Object). "
It must work:
"@link #DefaultMapBag(java.util.Map)"
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 09:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe #(java.util.Map) ??
> Stephen
There is nothing wrong with the [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag. Changing the constructor
access modifier from protected to public allowed the [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag to
work.
-Janek
--
Maybe #(java.util.Map) ??
Stephen
> from:Janek Bogucki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> date:Fri, 20 Jun 2003 02:47:57
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> subject: Re: [collections] [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag for constructor with parameters?
>
> Does anyone know how to make a [EMAIL PROTECTED] work for
Does anyone know how to make a [EMAIL PROTECTED] work for a constructor with
parameters? I tried fixing a [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag in DefaultMapBag:
* (or invoke the [EMAIL PROTECTED] #DefaultMapBag(java.util.Map) Map-constructor})
but I couldn't make it work. This is the warning generated when doi
