I think that technically no, but I'd suggest keeping it. At some point,
there will be users of junit 4.0, so it's best to express which version
your test code is designed to run with.
Cheers,
Brett
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> Brett (or others!),
> Do we actually need the junit dependency to be d
Brett (or others!),
Do we actually need the junit dependency to be declared in project.xml?
Recently, I've just been deleting it as unecessary.
Stephen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: brett
Date: Fri Oct 14 06:34:14 2005
New Revision: 321112
- junit
+ junit
+ junit
Well I guess thats good news that I managed to get a commit done ;-)
However it wasn't before I'd checked out the whole of lang with all its
history. Having to navigate to lang/trunk before doing Checkout As is just
weird. If there are any subclipse developers lurking, I'd suggest that
subclipse
