Rich,
I'm still having trouble applying this patch (tried RH linux as well).
Can you just send me your copy of NodeCachingLinkedList? That's the only
file that's causing me trouble.
On 5 Jan 2003, Rich Dougherty wrote:
> Here's a repost of a patch which will fix this. Note that the
> reimplemen
My mistake, I think. I didn't notice before that I was getting a reject
on one of the files (relative to a fresh CVS checkout), so I was still
running the old version of NodeCachingLinkedList.
I'm running patch under cygwin on win98 right now, so maybe there is
something odd here. I can try agai
> Even with this patch applied, I seem to get 2 errors, seemingly
> serialVersionID issues (see below).
I just did a fresh checkout from CVS and applied the patch and it worked
ok for me on two different JDKs.
It seems a bit odd, but perhaps you have different versions of
NodeCachingLinkedList.em
Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
By the way, this brings to my attention that gump isn't running the unit
tests, which we should probably have it do.
Easy enough. Simply change the target in here:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jakarta-gump/project/jakarta-commons.xml?rev=HEAD&content-typ
Even with this patch applied, I seem to get 2 errors, seemingly
serialVersionID issues (see below).
Also, I wonder if we might find a less "common" name than
CommonsLinkedList (perhaps ExtensibleLinkedList if that's the intention?),
but thats a minor issue (we could always change it before release
Here's a repost of a patch which will fix this. Note that the
reimplementation of java.util.LinkedList is necessary so we can override
node creation and deletion without using Sun's code.
Rich
--- Begin Message ---
(I'm reposting this, since I sent the original over eight hours ago and it
hasn't
With the CVS head of collections, I get 2 failures and 2 errors from the
test suite (out of 2280 tests).
Here are the specific problems, along with the interesting parts of the
stack traces. As the failure messages suggest, the files
data/test/NodeCachingLinkedList.* do indeed seem to be missing
