Re: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties

2003-12-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Stephen Colebourne wrote: The biggest difference seems to be the lack of a public void save(OutputStream output, String Header) Any particular reason why it was removed? Could it be put back? Stephen I don't know but it seems the first version of the save method in BasePropertiesConfiguration wa

Re: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties

2003-12-29 Thread Stephen Colebourne
The biggest difference seems to be the lack of a public void save(OutputStream output, String Header) Any particular reason why it was removed? Could it be put back? Stephen - Original Message - From: "Emmanuel Bourg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An ExtendedProperties can be easily replaced wit

Re: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties

2003-12-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Stephen Colebourne wrote: My question is whether [configuration] is more complex to use than ExtendedProperties. If there is no single equivalent class, then I'm not sure I can deprecate in [collections]. An ExtendedProperties can be easily replaced with a PropertiesConfiguration, it has the same

Re: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties

2003-12-29 Thread Stephen Colebourne
tion). Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics >-Original Message- >From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 8:22 AM >To: Jakarta Commons Developers List >Subject: Re: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties > > &g

RE: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties

2003-12-29 Thread Shapira, Yoav
ge- >From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 8:22 AM >To: Jakarta Commons Developers List >Subject: Re: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties > > >Deprecate from both? :) > >Hen > >On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Emmanuel Bourg

Re: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties

2003-12-29 Thread Henri Yandell
Deprecate from both? :) Hen On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Actually ExtendedProperties isn't even used in [configuration], there > are just a method getConfiguration(ExtendedProperties) and a method > getExtendedProperties(Configuration) in ConfigurationConverter to > maintain com

Re: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties

2003-12-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Actually ExtendedProperties isn't even used in [configuration], there are just a method getConfiguration(ExtendedProperties) and a method getExtendedProperties(Configuration) in ConfigurationConverter to maintain compatibility with older code using ExtendedProperties. I'd suggest to deprecate i

[configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties

2003-12-28 Thread Stephen Colebourne
[collections] currently has an ExtendedProperties class. IIRC, this class forms part of the [configuration] project. I've never thought it fitted in [collections]. Now [configuration] is promoted, is it time to deprecate the [collections] version??? Basically, I'm trying to kick out all inappropri