On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 22:14, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >
> > Well, I just want to note that the original reason I raised the
> > possibility of returning ListIterator for matches was to resolve a
> > problem I had with implementing a Plugins module. I have since had an
> > "epiphany" :-) and h
On Sunday, September 28, 2003, at 11:38 PM, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 03:40, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 06:43 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi,
The current Rules interface defines
public List match(String uri, Stri
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 03:40, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 06:43 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> > Simon Kitching wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The current Rules interface defines
> >>
> >> public List match(String uri, String patern);
> >>
> >> This is giv
On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 06:43 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi,
The current Rules interface defines
public List match(String uri, String patern);
This is giving me significant problems for the Plugins module I am
working on. I also think it is simply the wro
Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi,
The current Rules interface defines
public List match(String uri, String patern);
This is giving me significant problems for the Plugins module I am
working on. I also think it is simply the wrong type to be returning
here; a List has many operations available on it w
Hi,
The current Rules interface defines
public List match(String uri, String patern);
This is giving me significant problems for the Plugins module I am
working on. I also think it is simply the wrong type to be returning
here; a List has many operations available on it which are not
appropria
