DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33873] - [digester] Named stacks are not popped at end of processing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33873] - [digester] Named stacks are not popped at end of processing

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33873 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Named stacks are not popped |[digester] Named stacks are |at end of proc

Re: [digester] named stacks

On Monday, July 14, 2003, at 01:08 AM, Simon Kitching wrote: Hi Robert, From this email, I presume that your implementation of "pass return value of CallMethodRule as parameter to another CallMethodRule" requires another stack? i have a few different ideas which could solve variations of this pro

Re: [digester] named stacks

Hi Robert, >From this email, I presume that your implementation of "pass return value of CallMethodRule as parameter to another CallMethodRule" requires another stack? Can you explain why the new stack is required? Thanks, Simon On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 05:08, robert burrell donkin wrote: > i'v