robert burrell donkin wrote:
i think that a digester 1.6.0 service release allowing digester to be
used with either commons collections 2.x or commons-collections 3.x
would be a very good idea. this release will focus on providing a
stable, compatible dependency rather than fixing bugs or ad
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 08:50, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> i think that a digester 1.6.0 service release allowing digester to be
> used with either commons collections 2.x or commons-collections 3.x
> would be a very good idea. this release will focus on providing a
> stable, compatible depe
On 8 Jun 2004, at 21:55, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Looks good.
Should we call you Mr. No-Binary-Dependencies now? ;)
i've been called much worse than that :)
i agree with stephen's general comments about dependencies and i
definitely think that we've all learnt a lot about writing library code
for
ject: [digester] release plan for release 1.6.0
>
>i think that a digester 1.6.0 service release allowing digester to be
>used with either commons collections 2.x or commons-collections 3.x
>would be a very good idea. this release will focus on providing a
>stable, compatible depende
i think that a digester 1.6.0 service release allowing digester to be
used with either commons collections 2.x or commons-collections 3.x
would be a very good idea. this release will focus on providing a
stable, compatible dependency rather than fixing bugs or adding new
features. a subsequ
