Re: [general] Killing projects (Was: [pattern] Proposed removal ofproject)

2002-11-25 Thread Henri Yandell
I don't agree. Look at it from the point of the Incubator project, these are projects which failed to make it in. Codec is not a good example as it is still in the state of trying to get in. Something like Patterns is accepted as not making its way in. When incubation fails [and that is all comm

Re: [general] Killing projects (Was: [pattern] Proposed removal ofproject)

2002-11-25 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
O'brien, Tim wrote: [codec] sat around for 8 months with no activity. It wasn't being displayed on the website, and it contained 3 classes that used to be available in [lang] ( I think.. ).This dormant project came in handy for me - I needed Soundex and Metaphone. My point isn't to start an

Re: [general] Killing projects (Was: [pattern] Proposed removal ofproject)

2002-11-25 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This would then be applied to other projects, for > > example: > > > > patterns, cjan, altrmi, armi, cadastre, graph, > > latka/latka-webapp? > > > > Hen > > Latka's not dead. :) At least two