Re: [i18n] Status?

2005-04-18 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi Mattias, I'm still taking care of this project. Any suggestions and proposals are appreciated! The I18n-component should be pretty stable and I used in in several projects. See comments inline... "Jakarta Commons Developers List" schrieb am 18.04.05 10:05:34: > > The i18n sandbox project se

[i18n] Status?

2005-04-18 Thread Mattias J
The i18n sandbox project seems to be quite similar to Commons Resources. What is the relationship between the two? Will they continue to co-exist? i18n is appealing to me because it allows for multiple properties (such as title and details) under a common key. We solve very similar problems in

AW: [i18n] status

2005-02-05 Thread Daniel Florey
more detail what the ConfigManager is for. Cheers, Daniel > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Im Auftrag von Anaximandro (Woody) > Gesendet: Samstag, 5. Februar 2005 06:03 > An: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL P

Re: [i18n] status

2005-02-04 Thread Anaximandro (Woody)
Thanx Oliver. I will wait for him, :o Woody - Original Message - From: "Oliver Zeigermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Anaximandro (Woody)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 3:47 PM Sub

Re: [i18n] status

2005-02-04 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
I am sure that your suggestions are valueable and you do not bore me at all. However, the proposals you made should be inspected by Daniel, as I have no deeper insight into neither contract nor i18n. Oliver On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:55:21 -0800, Anaximandro (Woody) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Olive

Re: [i18n] status

2005-02-04 Thread Anaximandro (Woody)
Oliver, I sent one proposal too (another class diagram, with a macro vision of my suggestions). The idea behind my suggestion is write one mediator (ConfigManager) to retain one specific configuration (I can have many threads running with diferent configurations) and put one service locator in Mes

Re: [i18n] status

2005-02-04 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Woody, I mainly work on xmlio, but am not aware of any proposed changes to the project. The class diagrams you sent have been put online by me. Oliver On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:15:41 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel and Oliver, please, this project will continue? > I se

[i18n] status

2005-02-04 Thread agodinhost
Daniel and Oliver, please, this project will continue? I sent a class diagram with changes (proposal changes) but I no receive any response from both. I know you are working on other projects (transaction, slide, etc ) but, please, aswer me. I really wanna participate ... Thanx again Woody