+1
-Phil
Rory Winston wrote:
If there are any [id] devs watching, do they think it might be
worthwhile removing the explicit dependency on [codec]? The only
portions of codec which are used in [id] are the Hex encoding and the
MD5/SHA-1 encoding routines. The hex encoding is trivial and could be
+1
Stephen
--- Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there are any [id] devs watching, do they think
> it might be
> worthwhile removing the explicit dependency on
> [codec]? The only
> portions of codec which are used in [id] are the Hex
> encoding and the
> MD5/SHA-1 encoding routine
If there are any [id] devs watching, do they think it might be
worthwhile removing the explicit dependency on [codec]? The only
portions of codec which are used in [id] are the Hex encoding and the
MD5/SHA-1 encoding routines. The hex encoding is trivial and could be
imported to the [id] codeba