[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-173?page=comments#action_12373368 ]
Paul Libbrecht commented on JELLY-173:
--
Felipe, Jelly is not dead but several committers are a bit... busy or tired...
I am currently giving a few cycles to polish things o
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-173?page=comments#action_12373221 ]
Felipe Leme commented on JELLY-173:
---
HIi Paul,
I haven't had a chance to give it a try yet, but I have a question: what's
Jelly current status? I mean, are there any plans t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-173?page=comments#action_12373220 ]
Felipe Leme commented on JELLY-173:
---
HIi Paul,
I haven't had a chance to give it a try yet, but I have a question: what's
Jelly current status? I mean, are there any plans t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-173?page=comments#action_12316206 ]
Paul Libbrecht commented on JELLY-173:
--
Definitely on the current subversion state, the one of xml taglib and jelly.
thanks
paul
> Support for XML Schema
> -
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-173?page=comments#action_12316150 ]
Felipe Leme commented on JELLY-173:
---
Hi Paul,
Ok, I will try, although I can't promisse when.
Anyway, which version of Jelly should I try? 1.0 or the cvs/svn code?
Tks,
--
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-173?page=comments#action_12316141 ]
Paul Libbrecht commented on JELLY-173:
--
Felipe, now the following works, I presume that should satisfy your wish, or?
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"/>
also th
[
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-173?page=comments#action_56414 ]
Hans Gilde commented on JELLY-173:
--
sorry, what output are you expecting from this?
> Support for XML Schema
> --
>
> Key: JELLY-173
>
