[jira] Commented: (MATH-164) Complex - Issue with non-compliance to C99!

2007-05-09 Thread Phil Steitz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12494617 ] Phil Steitz commented on MATH-164: -- I agree with Richard here and will add a little historical context. Initially, w

[jira] Commented: (MATH-164) Complex - Issue with non-compliance to C99!

2007-05-08 Thread Richard Lyon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12494424 ] Richard Lyon commented on MATH-164: --- I don't believe full compliance with C99 is required or desirable. For instance

[jira] Commented: (MATH-164) Complex - Issue with non-compliance to C99!

2007-05-08 Thread Luc Maisonobe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12494375 ] Luc Maisonobe commented on MATH-164: I confirm the issue. Currently, the multiplication operator is implemented us

[jira] Commented: (MATH-164) Complex - Issue with non-compliance to C99!

2007-05-07 Thread Richard Lyon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12494178 ] Richard Lyon commented on MATH-164: --- The behaviour is not consistant with how doubles are handled. For example: doub