At 15:28 09/06/2003 +0100, you wrote:
The functors have been one of the most discussed and fought about pieces
of code in commons.
View A is that they should reside in [lang] and [collections] should
depend on [lang].
Snip...
One problem with having them in [lang] was that these classes were no
The functors have been one of the most discussed and fought about pieces of code in
commons.
View A is that they should reside in [lang] and [collections] should depend on [lang].
View B is that each commons component should be independent if possible, and that
these are primarily [collections
At 23:26 14/05/2003 +0100, you wrote:
With the upcoming 2.0 [lang] release, I have been considering whether the
[lang] functor subpackage is still valid for release, especially given
[functor]. I have come to the conclusion that it is not.
While I can understand what you are doing here. There is s
