Re: [lang] 2.1-rc1 take 2 Was: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-15 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:58:47 -, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Issue-wise; there seemed to be a pretty big issue on encoding for > > Entities on the user's list. Stephen, any view on whether that's a > > blocker? > > I don't really

Re: [lang] 2.1-rc1 take 2 Was: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-15 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Issue-wise; there seemed to be a pretty big issue on encoding for Entities on the user's list. Stephen, any view on whether that's a blocker? I don't really understand the request. I think we would have to get a unit test, and this could take some time and

Re: [lang] 2.1-rc1 take 2 Was: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-14 Thread Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell wrote: Oddly almost a week to the hour since the previous email :) I've rebuilt the binaries using Ant under JDK 1.2. I've built the src distributions using Maven under JDK 1.5 and they now include the NOTICE.txt and other essential files. The javadoc, JDiff and release notes are un

[lang] 2.1-rc1 take 2 Was: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-13 Thread Henri Yandell
Oddly almost a week to the hour since the previous email :) I've rebuilt the binaries using Ant under JDK 1.2. I've built the src distributions using Maven under JDK 1.5 and they now include the NOTICE.txt and other essential files. The javadoc, JDiff and release notes are unchanged from last wee

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-07 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:57:10 -, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source > >> and binary dists using ant. I do this using an old JDK > >> (1.3, although perhaps it should even be 1.2). I a

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-07 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source and binary dists using ant. I do this using an old JDK (1.3, although perhaps it should even be 1.2). I also use this same jar file to upload to ibiblio. I do NOT use maven - it uses the wrong JDK and I

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-07 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:08:48 + (GMT), Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure if we've laid out how we are going to > build the release versions of [lang], but here is my > recommendation: > > For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source > and binary dists using a

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-07 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I am not sure if we've laid out how we are going to build the release versions of [lang], but here is my recommendation: For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source and binary dists using ant. I do this using an old JDK (1.3, although perhaps it should even be 1.2). I also use this same

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:42:30 -0500, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for > > the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1: > > > > http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/ > > > A cou

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-06 Thread Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell wrote: It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1: http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/ A couple of things to look at / fix: 1) Both src and binaries are missing NOTICE.txt 2) ant clean test u

[lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-06 Thread Henri Yandell
It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1: http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/ As far as remaining 2.1 issues, we only really have the request for DateUtils.iterator's javadoc to be better. Using JDiff