All,
It looks like when I cut the commons-lang 2.1 release back in June that I
did not set the ownership group or the chmod properly on the
commons-lang-2.1.pom.md5 file. It looks like on Sep 23 when the file in
/www/www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/commons-lang/poms were replaced,
the 2.1 pom
The Commons Lang team is pleased to announce the release of Commons Lang 2.1
from the Apache Software Foundation. This release contains several new features
and fixes, including:
- New package org.apache.commons.lang.mutable containing basic classes that
hold an Object or primitive and
All:
I've fixed the manifest to read:
Specification-Version: 2.1
Thanks Simon,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:35 AM
To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: [lang] 2.1 release
Hi,
I've noticed tha
Hi,
I've noticed that src/conf/MANIFEST.MF still has "2.0" in it.
Regards,
Simon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone (gently) enlighten me as to why it is better to build the
release binaries using 1.2? IIRC, for 2.0 we tested builds with 1.2,
but make the release binaries using 1.4.
If we did then we were wrong. Its not that the bytecode produced will be
wrong, but that the base JDK library has cha
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:58:47 -, Stephen Colebourne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Issue-wise; there seemed to be a pretty big issue on encoding for
> > Entities on the user's list. Stephen, any view on whether that's a
> > blocker?
>
> I don't really
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Issue-wise; there seemed to be a pretty big issue on encoding for
Entities on the user's list. Stephen, any view on whether that's a
blocker?
I don't really understand the request. I think we would have to get a unit
test, and this could take some time and
Henri Yandell wrote:
Oddly almost a week to the hour since the previous email :)
I've rebuilt the binaries using Ant under JDK 1.2.
I've built the src distributions using Maven under JDK 1.5 and they
now include the NOTICE.txt and other essential files.
The javadoc, JDiff and release notes are un
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:13:16 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for
> the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1:
>
> http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/
>
> As far a
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:57:10 -, Stephen Colebourne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source
> >> and binary dists using ant. I do this using an old JDK
> >> (1.3, although perhaps it should even be 1.2). I a
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source
and binary dists using ant. I do this using an old JDK
(1.3, although perhaps it should even be 1.2). I also
use this same jar file to upload to ibiblio. I do NOT
use maven - it uses the wrong JDK and I
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:08:48 + (GMT), Stephen Colebourne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure if we've laid out how we are going to
> build the release versions of [lang], but here is my
> recommendation:
>
> For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source
> and binary dists using a
I am not sure if we've laid out how we are going to
build the release versions of [lang], but here is my
recommendation:
For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source
and binary dists using ant. I do this using an old JDK
(1.3, although perhaps it should even be 1.2). I also
use this same
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:42:30 -0500, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for
> > the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1:
> >
> > http://www.a
Henri Yandell wrote:
It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for
the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1:
http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/
A couple of things to look at / fix:
1) Both src and binaries are missing NOTICE.txt
2) ant
It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for
the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1:
http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/
As far as remaining 2.1 issues, we only really have the request for
DateUtils.iterator's javadoc to be
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:16:05 +1300, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firstly, in RELEASE-NOTES.txt:
> "DEPRECTAIONS:" should be "DEPRECATIONS:"
Thanks.
> There was some discussion a while ago about having a "variable
> substitution" utility available to handle strings like
>
Hi,
Firstly, in RELEASE-NOTES.txt:
"DEPRECTAIONS:" should be "DEPRECATIONS:"
There was some discussion a while ago about having a "variable
substitution" utility available to handle strings like
"Hello, ${name}"
I seem to remember some code I wrote for Digester was adopted into Lang
for thi
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Still TODO:
> > > - WordUtils
Unsure exactly what was wanted with this.
The null handling seems to be there. I modified the javadoc a bit to
hopefully make understanding it easier. Although it's technically
correct to say that in the capitalzed word '
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 23:50:56 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:14:24 -, Stephen Colebourne
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Checking my mail history
> > >
> > > > Still TODO:
> > > > 5)
> > > > - WordUtils
> > > > Capitalize with separator methods nee
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:14:24 -, Stephen Colebourne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Checking my mail history
> >
> > > Still TODO:
> > > 5)
> > > - WordUtils
> > > Capitalize with separator methods need to define null handling for
> > > delimiter
> > > list, and better javadoc for two of the
> Hello All:
>
> I just noticed it's been about a month since the last 2.1 ponderings.
> Where do we stand now?
>
> Curious,
> Gary
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 7:22 PM
> To: Jakar
M
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] 2.1...
Sorry for the silence from me. As I've probably said a million times,
baby happened.
I'm full of coding energy, or perhaps the need to 'have coded' that
leads to coding happening and looking to direct some of it to L
Hello All:
I just noticed it's been about a month since the last 2.1 ponderings.
Where do we stand now?
Curious,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 7:22 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang
Also, what would you guys think of including deep comparisons of Maps and
Collections to the EqualsBuilder? I wrote similar code in Morph's
TestUtils.equals class which could probably be ported to EqualsBuilder for
lang 2.2. Should I open an enhancement ticket? The Morph code is avail
under
Consider 1-4 done of these.
Main task is documenting WordUtils and checking Duration/StopWatch.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 18,
rary like [lang].
Henri Yandell wrote:
Sorry for the silence from me. As I've probably said a million times,
baby happened.
I hadn't heard... congrats!
I'm full of coding energy, or perhaps the need to 'have coded' that
leads to coding happening and looking to direct som
"Sorry for the silence from me. As I've probably said a million times,
baby happened."
Congratulations!
"Gary seems to have taken care of
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32625. Is it ready
for closure Gary? Despite Matt Blum's comment on a work-around, it
still sounds like a fin
Sorry for the silence from me. As I've probably said a million times,
baby happened.
I'm full of coding energy, or perhaps the need to 'have coded' that
leads to coding happening and looking to direct some of it to Lang
2.1.
Looking at the wiki and bugzilla, we were near
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, matthew.hawthorne wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Matthew, any idea what the state of Mutables was? There seem to have been
> > many threads off and on for the last year or more.
>
> I submitted a bug report with an attached set of classes back at the end
> of August. I ma
Henri Yandell wrote:
Matthew, any idea what the state of Mutables was? There seem to have been
many threads off and on for the last year or more.
I submitted a bug report with an attached set of classes back at the end
of August. I made
a few minor changes based on other's suggestions since then.
Thought I'd put our Wiki to use.
Found Stephen's August 2.1 email and added all the open bugs to it on the
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Lang
The only one that I can easily tell has been done is Tokenizer.
Matthew, any idea what the state of Mutables was? There seem to have
32 matches
Mail list logo