Re: commons-lang-2.1.pom

2005-10-02 Thread Steven Caswell
All, It looks like when I cut the commons-lang 2.1 release back in June that I did not set the ownership group or the chmod properly on the commons-lang-2.1.pom.md5 file. It looks like on Sep 23 when the file in /www/www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/commons-lang/poms were replaced, the 2.1 pom

[ANNOUNCEMENTS] Commons Lang 2.1 Released

2005-06-13 Thread stevencaswell
The Commons Lang team is pleased to announce the release of Commons Lang 2.1 from the Apache Software Foundation. This release contains several new features and fixes, including: - New package org.apache.commons.lang.mutable containing basic classes that hold an Object or primitive and

RE: [lang] 2.1 release

2005-05-17 Thread Gary Gregory
All: I've fixed the manifest to read: Specification-Version: 2.1 Thanks Simon, Gary -Original Message- From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:35 AM To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: [lang] 2.1 release Hi, I've noticed tha

[lang] 2.1 release

2005-05-11 Thread Simon Kitching
Hi, I've noticed that src/conf/MANIFEST.MF still has "2.0" in it. Regards, Simon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [lang] 2.1 release

2005-04-17 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Can someone (gently) enlighten me as to why it is better to build the release binaries using 1.2? IIRC, for 2.0 we tested builds with 1.2, but make the release binaries using 1.4. If we did then we were wrong. Its not that the bytecode produced will be wrong, but that the base JDK library has cha

Re: [lang] 2.1-rc1 take 2 Was: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-15 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:58:47 -, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Issue-wise; there seemed to be a pretty big issue on encoding for > > Entities on the user's list. Stephen, any view on whether that's a > > blocker? > > I don't really

Re: [lang] 2.1-rc1 take 2 Was: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-15 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Issue-wise; there seemed to be a pretty big issue on encoding for Entities on the user's list. Stephen, any view on whether that's a blocker? I don't really understand the request. I think we would have to get a unit test, and this could take some time and

Re: [lang] 2.1-rc1 take 2 Was: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-14 Thread Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell wrote: Oddly almost a week to the hour since the previous email :) I've rebuilt the binaries using Ant under JDK 1.2. I've built the src distributions using Maven under JDK 1.5 and they now include the NOTICE.txt and other essential files. The javadoc, JDiff and release notes are un

[lang] 2.1-rc1 take 2 Was: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-13 Thread Henri Yandell
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:13:16 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for > the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1: > > http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/ > > As far a

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-07 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:57:10 -, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source > >> and binary dists using ant. I do this using an old JDK > >> (1.3, although perhaps it should even be 1.2). I a

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-07 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source and binary dists using ant. I do this using an old JDK (1.3, although perhaps it should even be 1.2). I also use this same jar file to upload to ibiblio. I do NOT use maven - it uses the wrong JDK and I

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-07 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:08:48 + (GMT), Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure if we've laid out how we are going to > build the release versions of [lang], but here is my > recommendation: > > For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source > and binary dists using a

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-07 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I am not sure if we've laid out how we are going to build the release versions of [lang], but here is my recommendation: For other projects I do, I build the jar file, source and binary dists using ant. I do this using an old JDK (1.3, although perhaps it should even be 1.2). I also use this same

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:42:30 -0500, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for > > the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1: > > > > http://www.a

Re: [lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-06 Thread Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell wrote: It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1: http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/ A couple of things to look at / fix: 1) Both src and binaries are missing NOTICE.txt 2) ant

[lang] 2.1 rc (practice)

2005-03-06 Thread Henri Yandell
It's done on a Mac under 1.4, so I need to get a Linux 1.2 going for the real thing, but I've created a distribution for 2.1: http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/ As far as remaining 2.1 issues, we only really have the request for DateUtils.iterator's javadoc to be

Re: [lang] 2.1

2005-02-08 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:16:05 +1300, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Firstly, in RELEASE-NOTES.txt: > "DEPRECTAIONS:" should be "DEPRECATIONS:" Thanks. > There was some discussion a while ago about having a "variable > substitution" utility available to handle strings like >

[lang] 2.1

2005-02-08 Thread Simon Kitching
Hi, Firstly, in RELEASE-NOTES.txt: "DEPRECTAIONS:" should be "DEPRECATIONS:" There was some discussion a while ago about having a "variable substitution" utility available to handle strings like "Hello, ${name}" I seem to remember some code I wrote for Digester was adopted into Lang for thi

Re: [lang] 2.1...

2005-02-06 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Still TODO: > > > - WordUtils Unsure exactly what was wanted with this. The null handling seems to be there. I modified the javadoc a bit to hopefully make understanding it easier. Although it's technically correct to say that in the capitalzed word '

Re: [lang] 2.1...

2005-02-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 23:50:56 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:14:24 -, Stephen Colebourne > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Checking my mail history > > > > > > > Still TODO: > > > > 5) > > > > - WordUtils > > > > Capitalize with separator methods nee

Re: [lang] 2.1...

2005-02-01 Thread Henri Yandell
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:14:24 -, Stephen Colebourne > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Checking my mail history > > > > > Still TODO: > > > 5) > > > - WordUtils > > > Capitalize with separator methods need to define null handling for > > > delimiter > > > list, and better javadoc for two of the

Re: [lang] 2.1...

2005-01-26 Thread Henri Yandell
> Hello All: > > I just noticed it's been about a month since the last 2.1 ponderings. > Where do we stand now? > > Curious, > Gary > > -Original Message----- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 7:22 PM > To: Jakar

Re: [lang] 2.1...

2005-01-25 Thread Stephen Colebourne
M To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [lang] 2.1... Sorry for the silence from me. As I've probably said a million times, baby happened. I'm full of coding energy, or perhaps the need to 'have coded' that leads to coding happening and looking to direct some of it to L

RE: [lang] 2.1...

2005-01-25 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello All: I just noticed it's been about a month since the last 2.1 ponderings. Where do we stand now? Curious, Gary -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 7:22 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [lang

Re: [lang] 2.1...

2004-12-19 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Also, what would you guys think of including deep comparisons of Maps and Collections to the EqualsBuilder? I wrote similar code in Morph's TestUtils.equals class which could probably be ported to EqualsBuilder for lang 2.2. Should I open an enhancement ticket? The Morph code is avail under

Re: [lang] 2.1...

2004-12-19 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Consider 1-4 done of these. Main task is documenting WordUtils and checking Duration/StopWatch. Stephen - Original Message - From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 18,

Re: [lang] 2.1...

2004-12-18 Thread Matt Sgarlata
rary like [lang]. Henri Yandell wrote: Sorry for the silence from me. As I've probably said a million times, baby happened. I hadn't heard... congrats! I'm full of coding energy, or perhaps the need to 'have coded' that leads to coding happening and looking to direct som

RE: [lang] 2.1...

2004-12-17 Thread Gary Gregory
"Sorry for the silence from me. As I've probably said a million times, baby happened." Congratulations! "Gary seems to have taken care of http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32625. Is it ready for closure Gary? Despite Matt Blum's comment on a work-around, it still sounds like a fin

[lang] 2.1...

2004-12-17 Thread Henri Yandell
Sorry for the silence from me. As I've probably said a million times, baby happened. I'm full of coding energy, or perhaps the need to 'have coded' that leads to coding happening and looking to direct some of it to Lang 2.1. Looking at the wiki and bugzilla, we were near

Re: [lang] 2.1 TODO

2004-06-02 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, matthew.hawthorne wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > Matthew, any idea what the state of Mutables was? There seem to have been > > many threads off and on for the last year or more. > > I submitted a bug report with an attached set of classes back at the end > of August. I ma

Re: [lang] 2.1 TODO

2004-06-02 Thread matthew.hawthorne
Henri Yandell wrote: Matthew, any idea what the state of Mutables was? There seem to have been many threads off and on for the last year or more. I submitted a bug report with an attached set of classes back at the end of August. I made a few minor changes based on other's suggestions since then.

[lang] 2.1 TODO

2004-06-01 Thread Henri Yandell
Thought I'd put our Wiki to use. Found Stephen's August 2.1 email and added all the open bugs to it on the Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Lang The only one that I can easily tell has been done is Tokenizer. Matthew, any idea what the state of Mutables was? There seem to have