+1
i'm pretty sure that we don't have the committers at the moment (unless
some others step up) to push forward both maths and a sandbox financials
component. also, it seems likely that the communities will (at least
initially) be almost identical. at some stage a decision will be required
but
O'brien, Tim wrote:
Alternatively, application areas should be separate modules entirely
This could invite people to propose a jakarta-commons-sandbox-financial
module...
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [math] financial functions?
Date: 10 Jun 2003 10:33:55 -0500
+1 on the idea of having these classes available for use, +1 on
*temporarily* adding this to commons-math, but -1 to adding them to
MathUtils (this code should be st
--- "O'brien, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I've been away for a few days, I'm back.
Will, I think this code
> would be really valuable (I'd like to use it myself), we should add it
> to a contrib source tree...
>
> On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 08:24, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > Al Chou wrote:
>
I 100% agree, I think we should keep such functionality in separate
modular packages. This is why I think even static access to stats
functions should not be in MathUtils specifically. Keep each set of
functionality as separate as possible from an implementation stand
point. There may come a da
Sorry, I've been away for a few days, I'm back. Will, I think this code
would be really valuable (I'd like to use it myself), we should add it
to a contrib source tree...
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 08:24, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Al Chou wrote:
> > --- Will Stranathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Has th
Sorry, I've been away for a few days, I'm back. Will, I think this code
would be really valuable (I'd like to use it myself), we should add it
to a contrib source tree...
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 08:24, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Al Chou wrote:
> > --- Will Stranathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Has th
Al Chou wrote:
--- Will Stranathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has there been any discussion about the possibility of adding some work to
Commons somewhere for common financial functions? I don't know if this
necessarily falls in the scope of the Math project, or if I would need to
submit a pro
--- Will Stranathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has there been any discussion about the possibility of adding some work to
> Commons somewhere for common financial functions? I don't know if this
> necessarily falls in the scope of the Math project, or if I would need to
> submit a proposal, o
Has there been any discussion about the possibility of adding some work to
Commons somewhere for common financial functions? I don't know if this
necessarily falls in the scope of the Math project, or if I would need to
submit a proposal, or if there is any general interest in this.
Some of th
10 matches
Mail list logo
